From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -tip 5/5] AHCI: Support multiple MSIs
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:42:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121002164220.GB2258@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121002050929.GD7756@gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 07:09:29AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > +irqreturn_t ahci_hw_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance)
> > +{
> > + struct ata_port *ap_this = dev_instance;
> > + struct ahci_port_priv *pp = ap_this->private_data;
> > + struct ata_host *host = ap_this->host;
> > + struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv = host->private_data;
> > + void __iomem *mmio = hpriv->mmio;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > + u32 irq_stat, irq_masked;
> > +
> > + VPRINTK("ENTER\n");
>
> Is this per IRQ handler execution debugging code still needed?
> Same for the other VPRINTK() lines in this patch.
These VPRINKs are only to make new handlers look like ahci_interrupt()
which did not change. I believe, if they need to go it is better to
remove them altogether, with a separate followup patch.
Jeff, what do you think?
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-02 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-01 8:08 [PATCH v3 -tip 0/5] x86, MSI, AHCI: Support multiple MSIs Alexander Gordeev
2012-10-01 8:09 ` [PATCH v3 -tip 1/5] x86, MSI: Support multiple MSIs in presense of IRQ remapping Alexander Gordeev
2012-10-02 4:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-02 11:06 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-10-02 11:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-04 7:54 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-10-04 9:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-01 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 -tip 2/5] x86, MSI: Allocate as many multiple IRQs as requested Alexander Gordeev
2012-10-02 4:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-01 8:11 ` [PATCH v3 -tip 3/5] x86, MSI: Minor readability fixes Alexander Gordeev
2012-10-02 4:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-01 8:12 ` [PATCH v3 -tip 4/5] PCI, MSI: Enable multiple MSIs with pci_enable_msi_block_auto() Alexander Gordeev
2012-10-01 8:13 ` [PATCH v3 -tip 5/5] AHCI: Support multiple MSIs Alexander Gordeev
2012-10-02 3:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-10-02 4:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-10-02 4:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-10-02 5:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-02 16:42 ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2012-10-02 16:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-10-04 14:35 ` Alexander Gordeev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121002164220.GB2258@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com \
--to=agordeev@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).