linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 49151] NULL pointer dereference in pata_acpi
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:58:00 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121021165800.7637511FC25@bugzilla.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-49151-11633@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49151





--- Comment #5 from Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>  2012-10-21 16:58:00 ---
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 05:04:12PM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote:
> Thanks for responding to the bug report so quickly. I've applied your
> patch and the kernel now finds my hard drive and the logs (pasted
> below) have a couple of warnings generated by the patch. So if I've
> understood correctly then your theory that ata_timing_find_mode() is
> returning NULL is correct.

Yes, it appears so.

> Thanks for looking into this, just let me know if you want me to do
> anything else.

Right, so we know what exactly happens and I think we have the right
people on CC who can make sense of why it happens.

If I'd be to guess, this is most probably a BIOS bug (what else?! :-))
which the pata_acpi code is not ready to handle.

Btw, Jeff, AFAICT, libata code should the very least catch this
situation so that we know. Patch for this below. From a quick look there
a couple of drivers which do not check ata_timing_find_mode()'s retval
and I guess at least issuing a warning in such situations could be
helpful with future issues.

However, I don't know how chatty this warning could become and whether
this is the right approach and not auditing all users is better.

What you can do, Phillip, is check whether some other specific PATA
driver supports your hardware and enable it instead of PATA_ACPI. What
does lspci on the box say? Or rather 'lspci -v' for more details. You
can also send dmesg from the box.

Thanks.

--
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:49:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] libata: Warn when unable to find timing descriptor based on
 xfer_mode

ata_timing_find_mode could return NULL which is not checked by all
low-level ATA drivers using it and cause a NULL ptr deref. Warn at least
so that possible issues can get fixed easily.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
---
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 3cc7096cfda7..f46fbd3bd3fb 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -2942,6 +2942,10 @@ const struct ata_timing *ata_timing_find_mode(u8
xfer_mode)

     if (xfer_mode == t->mode)
         return t;
+
+    WARN_ONCE(true, "%s: unable to find timing for xfer_mode 0x%x\n",
+            __func__, xfer_mode);
+
     return NULL;
 }

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-21 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-20 10:19 [Bug 49151] New: NULL pointer dereference in pata_acpi bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-20 10:31 ` [Bug 49151] " bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-20 10:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-20 12:00 ` [Bug 49151] New: " Borislav Petkov
2012-10-21 16:04   ` Phillip Wood
2012-10-21 16:57     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-22 15:47       ` Phillip Wood
2012-10-22 20:27         ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-23 10:05           ` Alan Cox
2012-10-23 10:17             ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-23 16:12               ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-24  6:43                 ` Anton V. Boyarshinov
2012-10-24  9:28               ` Phillip Wood
2012-10-24 10:57                 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-03  4:26                   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-11-03 16:30                     ` Alan Cox
2012-11-03 16:48                     ` Alan Cox
2012-11-16  4:50                       ` Jeff Garzik
2012-10-20 12:00 ` [Bug 49151] " bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-21 16:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-21 16:58 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2012-10-22 12:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-22 12:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-22 12:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-22 15:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-22 20:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-22 20:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-22 21:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-23 10:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-23 10:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-23 11:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-23 12:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-23 16:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-23 16:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-23 20:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-23 20:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-23 20:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-23 21:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-24  6:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-24  9:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-24 10:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-24 15:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-25 14:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-29 13:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-10-29 13:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-01 15:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-02 12:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-03  4:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-03  4:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-03  7:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-03 16:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-03 16:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-15 18:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-15 18:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-16  4:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-16  4:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-16  8:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-17 16:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-17 17:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-25 12:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-29  2:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-29 11:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-11-30 17:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-12-02 17:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-12-03  0:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-12-03  3:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-12-07  7:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-12-18  7:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-12-18  7:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-12-18 12:48 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121021165800.7637511FC25@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).