From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] AHCI: Optimize interrupt processing Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 19:03:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20130522170305.GD9563@kernel.dk> References: <20130521235003.GE6985@mtj.dyndns.org> <20130522143923.GD19383@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:48014 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753984Ab3EVRD2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 13:03:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130522143923.GD19383@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Gordeev Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" On Wed, May 22 2013, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:50:03AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hmmmmmm..... I'd normally apply this patch but block layer is just > > growing multi-queue support and libata is likely to be converted to mq > > in foreseeable future, so I'm a bit hesitant to make irq handling more > > sophiscated right now. Would you be interested in looking into > > converting libata to blk mq support? I'm pretty sure it'd yield far > > better outcome if done properly. > > I am not committing, but will look into it, sure. Would be most awesome, I'm sure Nic would not mind a bit of help on the SCSI/libata side :-) And personally, can't wait to run it on the laptop! That's right, I alpha test on the laptop. -- Jens Axboe