From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Subject: Re: SATA hdd refuses to reallocate a sector? Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 11:34:27 -0300 Message-ID: <20130630143427.GA10035@khazad-dum.debian.net> References: <20130623101940.GA4448@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <51C76858.4060906@pobox.com> <20130623215100.GA7414@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <201306240914.29502.linux@rainbow-software.org> <20130629184716.GA9330@khazad-dum.debian.net> <51CF6776.7090206@start.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:35430 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751652Ab3F3Oec (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:34:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51CF6776.7090206@start.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Ondrej Zary , Pavel Machek , Mark Lord , Marcus Overhagen , kernel list , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org On Sat, 29 Jun 2013, Mark Lord wrote: > On 13-06-29 02:47 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > You know, either the "long" or the "offline" SMART test routines do exactly > > that on any spinning rust device with a firmware that is not utterly broken. > > > > The HDD's firmware will rewrite, and even reallocate any "weak" sectors > > found by the surface scan. > > > > The drives I have tried this on (smartctl -t long), > abort at the first bad sector. Not useful. Which vendor? The Seagates I have on hand are not that crappy, for example (their issues are subpar mechanics and the resulting high rate of failure, but the firmware at least is not a piece of crap)... -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh