From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Add additional queued command opcodes from SATA spec Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:45:10 -0400 Message-ID: <20130722204510.GC13040@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <20130722200014.GA4042@mtj.dyndns.org> <7D07DE2D-D421-4E79-AB4B-27566DCB3655@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qe0-f43.google.com ([209.85.128.43]:36416 "EHLO mail-qe0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753873Ab3GVUpP (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:45:15 -0400 Received: by mail-qe0-f43.google.com with SMTP id q19so4094561qeb.30 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7D07DE2D-D421-4E79-AB4B-27566DCB3655@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Marc C Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 01:42:42PM -0700, Marc C wrote: > I have some out-of-tree user apps that exploit those opcodes > (via uapi). I eventually will have additional patches, but cannot Hmmm? I don't think ata.h is visible to userland, is it? > submit the pull request for them until the SATA 3.2 spec is public. Let's add the opcodes when it becomes actually used in the kernel then unless it's gonna be a PITA on your end. Thanks! -- tejun