From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] MSI/x86: Support pci_enable_msi_block_part() interface Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:32:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20130903133238.GA10522@htj.dyndns.org> References: <9a0ae6ff3d116109d9f61230936a5c6a057637e0.1378111919.git.agordeev@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9a0ae6ff3d116109d9f61230936a5c6a057637e0.1378111919.git.agordeev@redhat.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Gordeev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Joerg Roedel , Jan Beulich , Bjorn Helgaas List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:00:01AM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > @@ -60,18 +60,18 @@ static int do_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec) > WARN_ON(msidesc->irq); > WARN_ON(msidesc->msi_attrib.multiple); > WARN_ON(msidesc->nvec_used); > + BUG_ON(nvec_mme != __roundup_pow_of_two(nvec_mme)); Wouldn't !is_power_of_2() be better? Thanks. -- tejun