From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] AHCI: Conserve interrupts with pci_enable_msi_block_part() interface Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:18:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20130903141824.GD10522@htj.dyndns.org> References: <3bb1b4375655ecfde5017cc70973d078f2434d5d.1378111919.git.agordeev@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3bb1b4375655ecfde5017cc70973d078f2434d5d.1378111919.git.agordeev@redhat.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Gordeev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Joerg Roedel , Jan Beulich , Bjorn Helgaas List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:00:28AM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > + if (hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_NO_MSI) > + goto intx; > + > + rc = pci_enable_msi_block_part(pdev, n_ports, AHCI_MAX_PORTS); > + if (!rc) > + return AHCI_MAX_PORTS; > + if (rc < 0) > + goto intx; > + > + maxvec = rc; > + rc = pci_enable_msi_block_part(pdev, n_ports, maxvec); > + if (!rc) > + return maxvec; > + if (rc < 0) > + goto intx; Why is the above fallback necessary? The only other number which makes sense is roundup_pow_of_two(n_ports), right? What does the above fallback logic buy us? Thanks. -- tejun