From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] AHCI: Conserve interrupts with pci_enable_msi_block_part() interface Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 11:02:33 -0400 Message-ID: <20130904150233.GD25788@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <20130903135541.GB10522@htj.dyndns.org> <20130903145719.GB14221@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> <20130903162411.GA25040@mtj.dyndns.org> <20130904080623.GB8726@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:39951 "EHLO mail-qa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934791Ab3IDPCl (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2013 11:02:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130904080623.GB8726@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Gordeev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Joerg Roedel , Jan Beulich , Bjorn Helgaas Hello, On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:06:23AM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > > Please separate out threaded IRQ support from multiple MSI. > > This series does not really bring any structural change to the AHCI code - > just tweaks the MSI initialization. > > As threaded IRQ support vs multiple MSI is a separate issue what about > addressing it in a separate effort? I would have to think on how to do it > eigher :) Oh, I'm not saying that these all should be done together but it looks like you're interested in pushing things further in this respect and I wanna have an idea about the overall direction / future before acking further changes. IOW, I'm happy that you're working on it but also wanna make sure you're gonna see things through and know where things are headed. Thanks! -- tejun