From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/6] ahci: imx: Explicitly clear IMX6Q_GPR13_SATA_MPLL_CLK_EN Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:13:09 -0500 Message-ID: <20131120151309.GC28946@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1384942659-5362-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <1384943242-8201-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <20131120145907.GA28946@htj.dyndns.org> <201311201611.44120.marex@denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-yh0-f47.google.com ([209.85.213.47]:61554 "EHLO mail-yh0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751461Ab3KTPNO (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:13:14 -0500 Received: by mail-yh0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 29so2247473yhl.6 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:13:14 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201311201611.44120.marex@denx.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Marek Vasut Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Shawn Guo , Richard Zhu , Linux-IDE On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:11:43PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > It's already done in 2/6 of the series, I hope that is OK. Otherwise I can > separate this formating change from the 2/6 patch and shove it in front of this > one even. Which one do you prefer please? Oops, sorry about missing that. As long as the end result is correct, I don't mind either way. Thanks! -- tejun