From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] sata_rcar: Add R-Car Gen2 SATA PHY support Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 15:42:31 -0500 Message-ID: <20131129204231.GE21755@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1383912570-8393-1-git-send-email-valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com> <1383912570-8393-2-git-send-email-valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com> <52951B4D.3030205@cogentembedded.com> <20131129201406.GD21755@mtj.dyndns.org> <5298FAA8.2050300@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qe0-f47.google.com ([209.85.128.47]:35933 "EHLO mail-qe0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754241Ab3K2Umi (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Nov 2013 15:42:38 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5298FAA8.2050300@cogentembedded.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Valentine Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Kuninori Morimoto , Laurent Pinchart , Guennadi Liakhovetski , Kumar Gala , Vladimir Barinov , Sergei Shtylyov , Mark Rutland On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:35:52AM +0400, Valentine wrote: > On 11/30/2013 12:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > >Hello, > > > >On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:06:05AM +0400, Valentine wrote: > >>On 11/08/2013 04:09 PM, Valentine Barshak wrote: > >> > >>Tejun, > >>are you OK with taking this? > > > >Yeah, the stat part looks okay to me. How the two should be routed? > >Both through libata or should I just take the first one? > > I'm not sure about that. I'm more concerned about the first one. > But I wouldn't mind if you take both. Applied the first one to libata/for-3.14. Are people happy with the second one? If so, I'll put route that through libata/for-3.14 too. Thanks. -- tejun