From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ahci: st: Add support for ST's SATA IP Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:06:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20140219150654.GH10134@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1392641818-23419-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1392641818-23419-3-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20140218233645.GP31892@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140219083025.GB10504@lee--X1> <20140219140458.GA10134@htj.dyndns.org> <20140219150121.GG10504@lee--X1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171]:58905 "EHLO mail-qc0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753667AbaBSPG6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:06:58 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140219150121.GG10504@lee--X1> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexandre.torgue@st.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, hdegoede@redhat.com Hello, Lee. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:01:21PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > I think that's a pretty unfair ask. I could understand if the > patch(es) didn't apply, or were hindered by the new API change, but I > do not believe that is the case? Let me make it very clear to you. If you want your code in, you help maintaining the larger code base. I'm already extremely annoyed about the general behavior of embedded developers where the general attitude seems to be doing whatever to get *my* driver in the tree. So, fuck you a little bit and if you want to make it happen faster, help Hans' patchset mature. Unfair my ass. Thanks. -- tejun