From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sd: Optionally attach to ZBC devices Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 04:39:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20140730113905.GA12037@infradead.org> References: <1406645117-53088-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1406645117-53088-5-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20140729171414.GA1060@infradead.org> <53D893B3.6020407@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:44011 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752273AbaG3LjH (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:39:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53D893B3.6020407@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:41:55AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Yes, eventually. But can't we defer that to a next patchset? > I'd really like to have this one in, as it makes dealing with ZAC devices > _so much_ easier ... I'm happy to put the sd patch in if I can get another review for it. But even if you want me to carry the libata bits I will need a clear ACK from Tejun. And I really think it would belong into the libata tree.