From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 5/6] AHCI: Optimize single IRQ interrupt processing Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:27:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20140925032716.GC6903@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <20140923205710.GB17332@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140924104213.GA2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20140924130444.GA16555@htj.dyndns.org> <20140924140844.GB2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20140924143913.GH16555@htj.dyndns.org> <20140924145906.GC2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qg0-f41.google.com ([209.85.192.41]:51905 "EHLO mail-qg0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751537AbaIYD1T (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:27:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140924145906.GC2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Gordeev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:59:07PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:39:13AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Would it be possible for you compare threaded vs. unthreaded under > > relatively heavy load? > > I will try, although not quite soon. > > In the meantime I could fix and resend patches 1,2,3 and 6 as > they are not related to this topic. Makes sense? Yeap, sure thing. Thanks. -- tejun