From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/38] libata: use __scsi_print_command() Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:11:44 -0400 Message-ID: <20140929141144.GC15925@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1411991947-130166-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1411991947-130166-34-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20140929140606.GB15925@htj.dyndns.org> <54296856.2020104@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54296856.2020104@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: James Bottomley , Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Robert Elliott , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 04:10:30PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 09/29/2014 04:06 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:59:02PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > >> libata already uses an internal buffer, so we should be using > >> __scsi_print_command() here. > >> > >> Cc: Tejun Heo > >> Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org > >> Cc: LKML > >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke > > > > Applied to libata/for-3.18. > > > > Thanks. > > > Errm. > Nice that you did, but it sort of relies for patches 01-32 to be > applied previously. > I'd rather apply your Signed-off-by: to the patch and have it > routed through the SCSI tree; that way we're sure it'll only be > applied if the previous patches are in. > > Can you please pull it from libata to avoid build issues? Ah, okay, pulled it. Please feel free to add Acked-by: Tejun Heo Thanks. -- tejun