From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] libata: use blk taging Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:43:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20150109214307.GE2785@htj.dyndns.org> References: <546516bb62c91671b1464e6a7c68eebc8422efe5.1418928090.git.shli@fb.com> <20150109181529.GA1301458@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:63274 "EHLO mail-qc0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751827AbbAIVnK (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:43:10 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id i8so11198395qcq.11 for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 13:43:10 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150109181529.GA1301458@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Shaohua Li Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Kernel-team@fb.com, Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 10:15:29AM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > Ping! I like the idea but it bothers me that we end up with two separate ways of allocating command tags. Any chance the old one can be removed? Thanks. -- tejun