From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: ata: BUG in ata_sff_hsm_move Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:24:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20160129202440.GB4534@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <20160129115214.GM32380@htj.duckdns.org> <20160129122317.GO32380@htj.duckdns.org> <20160129181442.GA30391@dhcp-10-15-1-8.hsv.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-yk0-f171.google.com ([209.85.160.171]:35707 "EHLO mail-yk0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752830AbcA2UYm (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:24:42 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160129181442.GA30391@dhcp-10-15-1-8.hsv.redhat.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: David Milburn Cc: Dmitry Vyukov , syzkaller , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Alan Cox , Jeff Garzik , Sergei Shtylyov , Kostya Serebryany , Alexander Potapenko , Sasha Levin Hello, David. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:14:42PM -0600, David Milburn wrote: > Can ata_sff_hsm_move grab the lock and save off the task_state, > like this patch? It's not just the task_state. Everything the polling path is doing is dangerous. It's all pretty confused. Thanks. -- tejun