From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] AHCI: Remove obsolete Intel Lewisburg SATA RAID device IDs Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:16:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20160228131646.GK3965@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1456510192-27184-1-git-send-email-scott.lawson@intel.com> <20160227085154.GB26010@infradead.org> <20160227111855.GW3965@htj.duckdns.org> <20160228131003.GA21800@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com ([209.85.218.42]:34643 "EHLO mail-oi0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757071AbcB1NQs (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:16:48 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160228131003.GA21800@infradead.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: scott.lawson@intel.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 05:10:03AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 06:18:55AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:51:54AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:09:52AM -0800, scott.lawson@intel.com wrote: > > > > From: Scott Lawson > > > > > > > > These PCI device IDs have been removed from the Intel Lewisburg design > > > > specification. They are no longer needed. > > > > > > Let's keep them just in case.. > > > > Out of curiosity, any specific reasons to do so? > > If it's been added to the driver I'd expect at least prototype hardware > to already be out there. I see. Scott, can you please clarify the situation? Thanks. -- tejun