From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ata: add AMD Seattle platform driver Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:19:37 -0400 Message-ID: <20160318201937.GG20028@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1452789071-4090-1-git-send-email-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <5709817.yQT8N3CaLj@wuerfel> <20160316210713.GI21104@mtj.duckdns.org> <31951835.kMFH9CgruZ@wuerfel> <56EC4AB8.7040901@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qg0-f65.google.com ([209.85.192.65]:34308 "EHLO mail-qg0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751719AbcCRUTk (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:19:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56EC4AB8.7040901@amd.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Brijesh Singh Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Graeme Gregory Hello, On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:36:40PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote: > > It's your call in the end. My main objection is to the fact that > > I have suggested a clean implementation for the normal DT based > > path that also fixes existing platforms that used to work in the > > past and were broken by the (long-ago) move from drivers/ide to > > drivers/ata, Brijesh has not implemented that but has instead > > continued pushing the hack for the ACPI mode that is still > > experimental on ARM64. > > I am helping a customer who want EM support in a distro (using ACPI > mode). Since its difficult to update the bios hence can I request to > pull this driver. The driver solves the ACPI usecases. > > As per DT is concerned, will look into driver/ide and led framework > but since I am not very familiar with driver/ide and led framework > hence it will take sometime to design and implement the DT cases. Alright, will route it through for-4.6-fixes after the merge window but please do look into the issue that Arnd raised. Thanks. -- tejun