From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: failures due to "libata: disable forced PORTS_IMPL for >= AHCI 1.3 patch" Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:14:10 -0400 Message-ID: <20160324191410.GA7822@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <56F2C60A.5070504@linaro.org> <56F2E931.7010805@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f181.google.com ([209.85.161.181]:35821 "EHLO mail-yw0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750820AbcCXTON (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:14:13 -0400 Received: by mail-yw0-f181.google.com with SMTP id g127so71285120ywf.2 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:14:12 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56F2E931.7010805@linaro.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Srinivas Kandagatla Cc: Justin Maggard , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, hdegoede@redhat.com, mikpelinux@gmail.com Hello, On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 07:06:25PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > >A generic dt binding is probably a better way forward. The Annapurna > >Alpine platform seems to have the same issue. > > +1 for generic bindings. > > I suspected that other platforms would also hit the same issue. I can change the code so that PORTS_IMPL workaround is applied automatically for all platform drivers as a stop-gap. Do we need that or can we push dt based solution quickly enough? Thanks. -- tejun