From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/14] libata: ZAC support Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 12:38:22 -0400 Message-ID: <20160509163822.GH7110@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1461581156-92581-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20160425201627.GI7822@mtj.duckdns.org> <572C7A80.4000903@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <572C7A80.4000903@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Shaun Tancheff , Damien Le Moal , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 01:05:36PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 04/25/2016 10:16 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:45:42PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > >> here's a patchset implementing ZAC support for libata. > >> > >> This is the second part of a larger patchset for ZAC/ZBC support; > >> it requires the scsi trace fixes queued for in mkp/4.7/scsi-queue and > >> the patchset 'libata: SATL update' queued in tj/for-4.7-zac. > > > > The patches look good from libata side. If others are okay with it, I > > can pull mkp/4.7/scsi-queue into tj/for-4.7-zac and apply this series > > on top of it. > > > Ping? > > I can easily split off the libsas bits into a different patchset if > this turns out to be an issue. > But it would be really good if this could make it 4.7, it will help > further integration a _lot_. Pulled in mkp/4.7/scsi-queue into libata/for-4.7-zac and applied the patches on top. Thanks. -- tejun