From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] libata-eh: decode all taskfile protocols Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:08:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20160714230843.GA14093@infradead.org> References: <1468454751-12466-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1468454751-12466-7-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20160714144809.GH15005@htj.duckdns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:36379 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750893AbcGNXIq (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:08:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160714144809.GH15005@htj.duckdns.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: hare@suse.com, damien.lemoal@hgst.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:48:09AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 09:05:47AM +0900, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > From: Hannes Reinecke > > > > Some taskfile protocol values where missing in ata_eh_link_report(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > Applied 5-6 to libata/for-4.8. > > For the rest, I'll wait for the response on 4. FYI, 8-10 are totally independent of 4. While 5 kinda depends on 4 to work correctly, but I also don't actually see it in your tree.