From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: tom.ty89@gmail.com
Cc: hare@suse.de, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libata-scsi: fix read-only bits checking in ata_mselect_*()
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:20:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160720172007.GH4574@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <578eb0d1.e9b9420a.8694b.fc4c@mx.google.com>
So, just reverted this patch.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 06:59:23AM +0800, tom.ty89@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com>
>
> Commit 7780081c1f04 ("libata-scsi: Set information sense field for
> invalid parameter") changed how ata_mselect_*() make sure read-only
> bits are not modified. The new implementation introduced a bug that
> the read-only bits in the byte that has a changeable bit will not
> be checked.
>
> Added the necessary check, with comments explaining the heuristic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 06afe63..b47c3ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -3617,8 +3617,18 @@ static int ata_mselect_caching(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc,
> */
> ata_msense_caching(dev->id, mpage, false);
> for (i = 0; i < CACHE_MPAGE_LEN - 2; i++) {
> - if (i == 0)
> - continue;
> + /* Check the first byte */
> + if (i == 0) {
> + /* except the WCE bit */
> + if (mpage[i + 2] & 0xfb != buf[i] & 0xfb) {
This not only triggered compiler warning but is actually wrong. The
above is
mpage[i + 1] & (0xfb != buf[i]) & 0xfb
which is non-sensical. So, this patch wasn't tested at all. Not even
compile test. Please don't do this.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-20 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160712133703.2076-1-me>
2016-07-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] libata-scsi: better style in ata_msense_caching() tom.ty89
2016-07-12 14:48 ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-12 16:20 ` Tom Yan
2016-07-12 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-12 17:54 ` Tom Yan
2016-07-19 20:39 ` [PATCH v4] libata-scsi: better style in ata_msense_*() tom.ty89
2016-07-19 20:44 ` Tom Yan
2016-07-19 21:11 ` [PATCH v4] libata-scsi: minor cleanup in ata_mselect_*() tom.ty89
2016-07-19 22:50 ` [PATCH] libata-scsi: fix read-only bits checking " tom.ty89
2016-07-19 22:59 ` Tom Yan
2016-07-19 22:59 ` [PATCH v2] " tom.ty89
2016-07-20 15:25 ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-20 17:20 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-07-19 23:03 ` [PATCH v4] libata-scsi: minor cleanup " Tom Yan
2016-07-20 15:22 ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-20 15:22 ` [PATCH v4] libata-scsi: better style in ata_msense_*() Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160720172007.GH4574@htj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.ty89@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).