public inbox for linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ahci: disable correct irq for dymmy ports
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:36:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160811163637.GD2695@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470925562-28914-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>

Hello, Christoph.

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:26:01AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> irq already contains the interrupt number for the port, don't add the port
> index to it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/libahci.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci.c b/drivers/ata/libahci.c
> index 7461a58..dcf2c72 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci.c
> @@ -2524,7 +2524,7 @@ static int ahci_host_activate_multi_irqs(struct ata_host *host,
>  
>  		/* Do not receive interrupts sent by dummy ports */
>  		if (!pp) {
> -			disable_irq(irq + i);
> +			disable_irq(irq);
>  			continue;
>  		}

I'm not following.  The driver at that point has irqs in the range
[@irq, @irq + @host->n_ports - 1] and is trying to activate them and
the above code block disables irq for a port which should be skipped.
Why wouldn't it need to be indexed?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-11 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-11 14:26 two ahci fixes from code inspection Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-11 14:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] ahci: disable correct irq for dymmy ports Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-11 16:36   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-08-11 17:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-11 17:42       ` Tejun Heo
2016-08-11 14:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] ahci: also use a per-port lock for the multi-MSIX case Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-11 16:39   ` Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-11 14:24 [PATCH 1/2] ahci: disable correct irq for dymmy ports Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160811163637.GD2695@mtj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox