From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: command emulation fix Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:23:16 -0500 Message-ID: <20170119202316.GA25390@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1484412602-11801-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20170115230723.GB14446@mtj.duckdns.org> <20170116152120.GA16072@lst.de> <20170118191750.GA9171@mtj.duckdns.org> <20170119143551.GA31203@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:34424 "EHLO mail-pf0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753872AbdASUXX (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:23:23 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id e4so15989794pfg.1 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 12:23:23 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170119143551.GA31203@lst.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hello, Christoph. On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:35:51PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:17:50AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > > I reverted just the last patch. The rest should be fine, right? > > Yes. And personally I think the last one is also fine, but we > seem to disagree. Yeah, it is probably fine but I just feel weird about changing the code to introduce a possible failure case. Let's leave it as-is for now. Thanks. -- tejun