From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ATA/ARM: convert ARM/DaVinci to use libata PATA drivers Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:56:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20170321165650.GA3706@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1489509414-11491-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <20170316213255.GF1480@htj.duckdns.org> <3c115ec1-2d11-695e-eca7-25a75f71b96f@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3c115ec1-2d11-695e-eca7-25a75f71b96f@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Sekhar Nori Cc: Russell King , Sergei Shtylyov , Arnd Bergmann , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Kevin Hilman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:08:26PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > > Looks fine to me from libata side. Once it gets tested, how should > > the patches be routed? I don't think it'd make sense to route them > > separately. > > Hi Tejun, I can take the series through ARM-SoC tree with your ack. Once the review points are addressed, please feel free to add Acked-by: Tejun Heo and route through the arm tree. Thanks. -- tejun