From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: sd: wait for slow devices on shutdown path
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:49:33 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170410234933.GA10185@khazad-dum.debian.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170410232118.GA4816@khazad-dum.debian.net>
Author: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
Date: Wed Feb 1 20:42:02 2017 -0200
sd: wait for slow devices on shutdown path
Wait 1s during suspend/shutdown for the device to settle after
we issue the STOP command.
Otherwise we race ATA SSDs to powerdown, possibly causing damage to
FLASH/data and even bricking the device.
This is an experimental patch, there are likely better ways of doing
this that don't punish non-SSDs.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 4e08d1cd..3c6d5d3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -3230,6 +3230,38 @@ static int sd_start_stop_device(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, int start)
res = 0;
}
+ /*
+ * Wait for slow devices that signal they have fully entered
+ * the stopped state before they actully did it.
+ *
+ * This behavior is apparently allowed per-spec for ATA
+ * devices, and our SAT layer does not account for it.
+ * Thus, on return, the device might still be in the process
+ * of entering STANDBY state.
+ *
+ * Worse, apparently the ATA spec also says the unit should
+ * return that it is already in STANDBY state *while still
+ * entering that state*.
+ *
+ * SSDs absolutely depend on receiving a STANDBY IMMEDIATE
+ * command prior to power off for a clean shutdown (and
+ * likely we don't want to send them *anything else* in-
+ * between either, to be on the safe side).
+ *
+ * As things stand, we are racing the SSD's firmware. If it
+ * finishes first, nothing bad happens. If it doesn't, we
+ * cut power while it is still saving metadata, and not only
+ * this will cause extra FLASH wear (and maybe even damage
+ * some cells), it also has a non-zero chance of bricking the
+ * SSD.
+ *
+ * Issue reported on Intel, Crucial and Micron SSDs.
+ * Issue can be detected by S.M.A.R.T. signaling unexpected
+ * power cuts.
+ */
+ if (!res && !start)
+ msleep(1000);
+
/* SCSI error codes must not go to the generic layer */
if (res)
return -EIO;
--
Henrique Holschuh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-10 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-10 23:21 Race to power off harming SATA SSDs Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-04-10 23:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 23:50 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-04-10 23:49 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [this message]
2017-04-10 23:52 ` Tejun Heo
2017-04-10 23:57 ` James Bottomley
2017-04-11 2:02 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-04-11 1:26 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-04-11 10:37 ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-04-11 14:31 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-04-12 7:47 ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-05-07 20:40 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 7:21 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 7:38 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2017-05-08 8:13 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 8:36 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2017-05-08 8:54 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 9:06 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2017-05-08 9:09 ` Hans de Goede
2017-05-08 10:13 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 11:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-08 15:40 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 21:36 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 16:43 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 17:43 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-08 18:56 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 19:04 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-08 18:29 ` Atlant Schmidt
2017-05-08 10:12 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 9:28 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 9:34 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 10:49 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 11:06 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-08 11:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-08 11:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-08 12:13 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-08 11:09 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 12:32 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 9:51 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170410234933.GA10185@khazad-dum.debian.net \
--to=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox