* [PATCH] ata: mark expected switch fall-throughs
@ 2017-10-12 19:19 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-10-21 16:29 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2017-10-12 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans de Goede, Tejun Heo, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Cc: linux-ide, linux-kernel, Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
In cases where a "drop through" comment was already in place, I replaced
it with a proper "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
Please, double check if the actual intention of the code is to
fall through.
drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 1 +
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 3 +++
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 2 ++
drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 2 ++
drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
index a270a11..341d0ef 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
@@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ static int ahci_platform_get_phy(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv, u32 port,
node->name);
break;
}
+ /* fall through */
case -ENODEV:
/* continue normally */
hpriv->phys[port] = NULL;
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 29e3516..5b18510 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -1879,6 +1879,7 @@ int ata_dev_read_id(struct ata_device *dev, unsigned int *p_class,
switch (class) {
case ATA_DEV_SEMB:
class = ATA_DEV_ATA; /* some hard drives report SEMB sig */
+ /* fall through */
case ATA_DEV_ATA:
case ATA_DEV_ZAC:
tf.command = ATA_CMD_ID_ATA;
@@ -2975,6 +2976,7 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
case -ENODEV:
/* give it just one more chance */
tries[dev->devno] = min(tries[dev->devno], 1);
+ /* fall through */
case -EIO:
if (tries[dev->devno] == 1) {
/* This is the last chance, better to slow
@@ -3462,6 +3464,7 @@ int ata_down_xfermask_limit(struct ata_device *dev, unsigned int sel)
case ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0:
pio_mask &= 1;
+ /* fall through */
case ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO:
mwdma_mask = 0;
udma_mask = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 49b3745..e070fe8 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -3711,9 +3711,11 @@ static int ata_eh_handle_dev_fail(struct ata_device *dev, int err)
case -ENODEV:
/* device missing or wrong IDENTIFY data, schedule probing */
ehc->i.probe_mask |= (1 << dev->devno);
+ /* fall through */
case -EINVAL:
/* give it just one more chance */
ehc->tries[dev->devno] = min(ehc->tries[dev->devno], 1);
+ /* fall through */
case -EIO:
if (ehc->tries[dev->devno] == 1) {
/* This is the last chance, better to slow
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
index 3ea50dc..3729e24 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ static int atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(struct ata_port *ap,
default:
printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: active %dclk is invalid. "
"Using 12clk.\n", clk);
+ /* fall through */
case 9 ... 12:
clocks = 7; /* 12 clk */
break;
@@ -203,6 +204,7 @@ static int atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(unsigned int clk)
default:
printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: recover %dclk is invalid. "
"Using default 12clk.\n", clk);
+ /* fall through */
case 12: /* default 12 clk */
clocks = 0;
break;
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
index 3b2246d..03f5301 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
@@ -2387,7 +2387,7 @@ static unsigned int mv_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
": attempting PIO w/multiple DRQ: "
"this may fail due to h/w errata\n");
}
- /* drop through */
+ /* fall through */
case ATA_PROT_NODATA:
case ATAPI_PROT_PIO:
case ATAPI_PROT_NODATA:
@@ -3877,7 +3877,7 @@ static int mv_chip_id(struct ata_host *host, unsigned int board_idx)
" and avoid the final two gigabytes on"
" all RocketRAID BIOS initialized drives.\n");
}
- /* drop through */
+ /* fall through */
case chip_6042:
hpriv->ops = &mv6xxx_ops;
hp_flags |= MV_HP_GEN_IIE;
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ata: mark expected switch fall-throughs
2017-10-12 19:19 [PATCH] ata: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2017-10-21 16:29 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2017-10-21 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Cc: Hans de Goede, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, linux-ide, linux-kernel
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:19:16PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> In cases where a "drop through" comment was already in place, I replaced
> it with a proper "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting
> to find.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Applied to libata/for-4.15.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-21 16:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-12 19:19 [PATCH] ata: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-10-21 16:29 ` Tejun Heo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).