From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89C4C433EF for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 18:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232395AbiCZSKH (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2022 14:10:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32768 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232404AbiCZSKH (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2022 14:10:07 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B76D37666 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:08:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1648318110; x=1679854110; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Hhckl5uHWCH7Sb8Xzw3uP9VqiCG1wboxclAdlY2Hvnc=; b=HP2mK4pCEM6Mn2TJqBAAODlj6/iCQBD5MKmF4/Bh3uFXHA5OkZm7enMY g1fJed7KHgOP+MVaifojqOSlbH2/kZwqtcSSjRjwAD8tczuzdey43dqIg i/nZnii2lpZhRwhIAU0x6mYtlHKXijw6hLbeL1fOC38JTs/Ciyk31CxzP 1UX8z3CwlN951U1BvFNCdFAimRh9FlaLwyYpxsQi3TCSpORSDWL/SPszp HUQtBcRGvsebGa1fsgAbYCWmQ6eNGN9FmsuHnG0NHWYOyHrmBtBrnILpQ oW8l+6drCXH9x0sN3ySckYJMjFWGEbh7zow2gNWK/DTuTid5/gmB8YMdw w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10298"; a="319500577" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,213,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="319500577" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Mar 2022 11:08:30 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,213,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="562204704" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 89b41b6ae01c) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2022 11:08:28 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 89b41b6ae01c with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nYApw-0000GP-7v; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 18:08:28 +0000 Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 02:08:05 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Hannes Reinecke , Damien LeMoal Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke Subject: [RFC PATCH] libata: ata_bus_type can be static Message-ID: <20220326180805.GA126281@a969c731af34> References: <20220325125624.99929-2-hare@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220325125624.99929-2-hare@suse.de> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org drivers/ata/libata-transport.c:88:17: warning: symbol 'ata_bus_type' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- drivers/ata/libata-transport.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-transport.c b/drivers/ata/libata-transport.c index e5ed5046b299e2..b9412d1fe3e083 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-transport.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-transport.c @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ struct ata_internal { static int ata_tdev_add(struct ata_device *dev); static void ata_tdev_delete(struct ata_device *dev); -struct bus_type ata_bus_type = { +static struct bus_type ata_bus_type = { .name = "ata", };