public inbox for linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] ata: libata: Fix FUA handling in ata_build_rw_tf()
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 16:50:24 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221027075026.240017-5-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221027075026.240017-1-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>

If a user issues a write command with the FUA bit set for a device with
NCQ support disabled (that is, the device queue depth was set to 1), the
LBA 48 command WRITE DMA FUA EXT must be used. However,
ata_build_rw_tf() ignores this and first test if LBA 28 can be used.
That is, for small FUA writes at low LBAs, ata_rwcmd_protocol() will
cause the write to fail.

Fix this by preventing the use of LBA 28 for any FUA write request.
While at it, also early test if the request is a FUA read and fail these
requests for the NCQ-disabled case instead of relying on
ata_rwcmd_protocol() returning an error.

Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
---
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 81b20ffb1554..fea06f41f371 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -725,9 +725,21 @@ int ata_build_rw_tf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc, u64 block, u32 n_block,
 		    class == IOPRIO_CLASS_RT)
 			tf->hob_nsect |= ATA_PRIO_HIGH << ATA_SHIFT_PRIO;
 	} else if (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_LBA) {
+		bool lba28_ok;
+
+		if (tf->flags & ATA_TFLAG_FUA) {
+			/* FUA reads are not defined */
+			if (!(tf->flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE))
+				return -EINVAL;
+			/* We need LBA48 / WRITE DMA FUA EXT for FUA writes */
+			lba28_ok = false;
+		} else {
+			lba28_ok = lba_28_ok(block, n_block);
+		}
+
 		tf->flags |= ATA_TFLAG_LBA;
 
-		if (lba_28_ok(block, n_block)) {
+		if (lba28_ok) {
 			/* use LBA28 */
 			tf->device |= (block >> 24) & 0xf;
 		} else if (lba_48_ok(block, n_block)) {
@@ -742,9 +754,10 @@ int ata_build_rw_tf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc, u64 block, u32 n_block,
 			tf->hob_lbah = (block >> 40) & 0xff;
 			tf->hob_lbam = (block >> 32) & 0xff;
 			tf->hob_lbal = (block >> 24) & 0xff;
-		} else
+		} else {
 			/* request too large even for LBA48 */
 			return -ERANGE;
+		}
 
 		if (unlikely(!ata_set_rwcmd_protocol(dev, tf)))
 			return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.37.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-27  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-27  7:50 [PATCH v3 0/6] Improve libata support for FUA Damien Le Moal
2022-10-27  7:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] ata: libata: Introduce ata_ncq_supported() Damien Le Moal
2022-10-27  9:24   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-27  7:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] ata: libata: Rename and cleanup ata_rwcmd_protocol() Damien Le Moal
2022-10-27  9:25   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-27  9:43   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2022-10-27  7:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] ata: libata: cleanup fua handling Damien Le Moal
2022-10-27  9:32   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-27  7:50 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2022-10-27  8:21   ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ata: libata: Fix FUA handling in ata_build_rw_tf() Niklas Cassel
2022-10-27  9:12     ` Damien Le Moal
2022-10-27  9:42   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-27 22:22     ` Damien Le Moal
2022-10-28 10:01       ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-28 16:45       ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-28 16:45   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-10-27  7:50 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ata: libata: blacklist FUA support for known buggy drives Damien Le Moal
2022-10-27  7:50 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] ata: libata: Enable fua support by default Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221027075026.240017-5-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox