From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFD6C54E94 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 05:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229677AbjAZF0a (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 00:26:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54032 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229510AbjAZF03 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 00:26:29 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9D0A47ED3; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:26:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 3565968D09; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 06:26:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 06:26:24 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Keith Busch Cc: Damien Le Moal , Bart Van Assche , Niklas Cassel , Paolo Valente , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/18] block: introduce duration-limits priority class Message-ID: <20230126052624.GA28310@lst.de> References: <20230124190308.127318-1-niklas.cassel@wdc.com> <20230124190308.127318-2-niklas.cassel@wdc.com> <731aeacc-74c0-396b-efa0-f9ae950566d8@opensource.wdc.com> <873e0213-94b5-0d81-a8aa-4671241e198c@acm.org> <4c345d8b-7efa-85c9-fe1c-1124ea5d9de6@opensource.wdc.com> <5066441f-e265-ed64-fa39-f77a931ab998@acm.org> <275993f1-f9e8-e7a8-e901-2f7d3a6bb501@opensource.wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 04:11:41PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > I wouldn't necessarily rule out CDL for PCI attached in some future TP. NVMe > does allow rotating media, and they'll want feature parity if CDL is considered > useful in other protocols. NVMe has a TP for CDL that is technically active, although it doesn't seem to be actively worked on right now.