Linux ATA/IDE development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Phil Pemberton" <philpem@philpem.me.uk>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, dlemoal@kernel.org, cassel@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] ata: libata-scsi: add atapi_max_lun module parameter
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 22:10:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608221024.28F491F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608213443.2296614-2-philpem@philpem.me.uk>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Logic and documentation mismatch in `atapi_max_lun` leading to an off-by-one configuration error.
--

commit 62d1cf766cb69ddd660120719652195586b409e8
Author: Phil Pemberton <philpem@philpem.me.uk>

ata: libata-scsi: add atapi_max_lun module parameter

This commit introduces a libata module parameter atapi_max_lun to control
the upper bound of the per-host SCSI LUN scan for ATAPI devices. The
default is 1 to preserve existing behavior, but can be clamped up to
ATAPI_MAX_LUN (8) to support multi-LUN ATAPI devices.

> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> index e76d15411e2ae..4408b1fb48c77 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -122,6 +122,11 @@ int atapi_passthru16 = 1;
>  module_param(atapi_passthru16, int, 0444);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(atapi_passthru16, "Enable ATA_16 passthru for ATAPI devices (0=off, 1=on [default])");
>  
> +int atapi_max_lun = 1;
> +module_param(atapi_max_lun, int, 0444);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(atapi_max_lun,
> +	"Maximum LUN to scan on ATAPI devices flagged BLIST_FORCELUN (1 [default] .. 7)");

[Severity: Medium]
Is this documentation correct about the upper limit being 7?

The SCSI core treats shost->max_lun as an exclusive upper bound, meaning it
represents the total count of LUNs to scan. If a user sets atapi_max_lun to 7
based on this description, only LUNs 0 through 6 will be scanned, missing
LUN 7.

> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index f44612e269a4d..32c6a0e497cf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -4627,7 +4627,7 @@ int ata_scsi_add_hosts(struct ata_host *host, const struct scsi_host_template *s
>  		shost->transportt = &ata_scsi_transportt;
>  		shost->unique_id = ap->print_id;
>  		shost->max_id = 16;
> -		shost->max_lun = 1;
> +		shost->max_lun = clamp(atapi_max_lun, 1, ATAPI_MAX_LUN);

[Severity: Medium]
Since ATAPI_MAX_LUN is 8, the clamp allows a value of 8. To correctly scan up
to LUN 7, should the module parameter description be updated to indicate the
maximum value is 8? Or does atapi_max_lun require a +1 adjustment when
assigning it to shost->max_lun in ata_scsi_add_hosts()?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608213443.2296614-1-philpem@philpem.me.uk?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-08 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-08 21:34 [PATCH v6 0/6] ata: libata-scsi: multi-LUN ATAPI device support Phil Pemberton
2026-06-08 21:34 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] ata: libata-scsi: add atapi_max_lun module parameter Phil Pemberton
2026-06-08 22:10   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-08 21:34 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] ata: libata-scsi: convert dev->sdev to per-LUN array Phil Pemberton
2026-06-08 22:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  7:22   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-06-08 21:34 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] ata: libata-scsi: route non-zero LUN commands for multi-LUN ATAPI Phil Pemberton
2026-06-08 22:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  7:24   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-06-08 21:34 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] scsi: add BLIST_NO_LUN_1F blacklist flag Phil Pemberton
2026-06-08 22:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  7:24   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-06-08 21:34 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] ata: libata-scsi: probe additional LUNs for multi-LUN ATAPI devices Phil Pemberton
2026-06-08 22:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  7:25   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-06-08 21:34 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] scsi: scsi_devinfo: add COMPAQ PD-1 multi-LUN ATAPI device quirk Phil Pemberton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260608221024.28F491F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philpem@philpem.me.uk \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox