From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Karuna Ramkumar" <rkaruna@google.com>
Cc: cassel@kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, dlemoal@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: libata-scsi: limit simulated SCSI command copy to response length
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:05:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260629180513.C8DCB1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629175024.2187500-1-rkaruna@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] A malicious or misconfigured ATA device can trigger an out-of-bounds heap read in ata_dev_config_cpr() and a massive global buffer overflow in ata_scsiop_inq_b9() by reporting a large nr_cpr value. The newly added defensive check in ata_scsi_rbuf_fill() executes after the overflow has already occurred.
- [Critical] ata_format_dsm_trim_descr() overflows the static ata_scsi_rbuf for devices with large sector sizes.
--
commit 8b4a8e5bfe8806f87d80466e94aa7a4684517178
Author: Karuna Ramkumar <rkaruna@google.com>
ata: libata-scsi: limit simulated SCSI command copy to response length
The function ata_scsi_rbuf_fill() is used to copy the response of
emulated SCSI commands from ata_scsi_rbuf to the SCSI command's
scatterlist.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index d54ec1631e9a6..0ddec111a78c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -1933,8 +1933,10 @@ static void ata_scsi_rbuf_fill(struct ata_device *dev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,
> memset(ata_scsi_rbuf, 0, ATA_SCSI_RBUF_SIZE);
> len = actor(dev, cmd, ata_scsi_rbuf);
> if (len) {
> + if (WARN_ON(len > ATA_SCSI_RBUF_SIZE))
> + len = ATA_SCSI_RBUF_SIZE;
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the overflow already occur before this
check is reached?
The actor function writes directly into the static ata_scsi_rbuf array.
For example, in ata_scsiop_inq_b9():
for (i = 0; i < cpr_log->nr_cpr; i++, desc += 32) {
...
put_unaligned_be64(cpr_log->cpr[i].num_lbas, &desc[16]);
}
If a device reports a large nr_cpr value (up to 255), this loop could write
up to 8224 bytes into the 2048-byte ata_scsi_rbuf array during the actor()
call, before the defensive WARN_ON() check has a chance to execute.
Additionally, could ata_dev_config_cpr() perform an out-of-bounds heap read
when reading this large nr_cpr value?
cpr_log->nr_cpr = nr_cpr;
desc = &buf[64];
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpr; i++, desc += 32) {
cpr_log->cpr[i].num = desc[0];
...
If nr_cpr exceeds the allocated buffer space based on buf_len, this loop
appears to read past the end of the allocation.
[Severity: Critical]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does ata_format_dsm_trim_descr()
overflow this same static buffer for devices with large sector sizes?
When a filesystem discard is issued to a device with a 4K logical sector size,
ata_scsi_write_same_xlat() calculates trmax as 512:
size_t len = sdp->sector_size;
...
const u32 trmax = len >> 3;
In ata_format_dsm_trim_descr():
if (len > ATA_SCSI_RBUF_SIZE)
len = ATA_SCSI_RBUF_SIZE;
...
memset(buf, 0, len);
while (i < trmax) {
...
buf[i++] = __cpu_to_le64(entry);
While the memset() length is properly capped to 2048 bytes, the while loop
continues up to trmax. For a trmax of 512, this writes 512 8-byte entries
(4096 bytes) into the 2048-byte ata_scsi_rbuf array.
> sg_copy_from_buffer(scsi_sglist(cmd), scsi_sg_count(cmd),
> - ata_scsi_rbuf, ATA_SCSI_RBUF_SIZE);
> + ata_scsi_rbuf, len);
> cmd->result = SAM_STAT_GOOD;
> if (scsi_bufflen(cmd) > len)
> scsi_set_resid(cmd, scsi_bufflen(cmd) - len);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260629175024.2187500-1-rkaruna@google.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 17:50 [PATCH] ata: libata-scsi: limit simulated SCSI command copy to response length Karuna Ramkumar
2026-06-29 18:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-30 0:05 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-06-30 0:19 ` Karuna Ramkumar
2026-06-30 0:20 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260629180513.C8DCB1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkaruna@google.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox