From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: dlemoal@kernel.org, cassel@kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: pata_pxa: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 01:25:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715012506.CCBFE1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715011343.1270261-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Teardown order bug in `pxa_ata_remove()` causes Use-After-Free
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] ata: pata_pxa: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource ---
commit 5dcbe84075bf85bf6a553efa199d7ee5d2ff52be
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
ata: pata_pxa: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource
This commit replaces the open-coded platform_get_resource() and
devm_ioremap() sequences for the CMD and CTL ports with
devm_platform_ioremap_resource(). It simplifies the probe function by
consolidating resource fetching and mapping.
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c b/drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c
> index 9f63bdfb8576e..c816997dc0a99 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does pxa_ata_remove() have a use-after-free
if an interrupt occurs during module unload?
Looking at drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c:pxa_ata_remove():
static void pxa_ata_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct ata_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct pata_pxa_data *data = host->ports[0]->private_data;
dma_release_channel(data->dma_chan);
ata_host_detach(host);
}
The DMA channel is explicitly freed via dma_release_channel() before calling
ata_host_detach().
Because the ATA host is still active and its interrupt handler was registered
via devres (which only unregisters the IRQ after the remove callback
completes), an active device or a stray interrupt could trigger
ata_sff_interrupt().
This interrupt handler calls pxa_bmdma_status(), which dereferences the
already freed data->dma_chan.
Should ata_host_detach() be called before releasing the DMA channel to prevent
this race?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715011343.1270261-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 1:13 [PATCH] ata: pata_pxa: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource Rosen Penev
2026-07-15 1:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715012506.CCBFE1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox