From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: cassel@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dlemoal@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] PCI: Fix dyn_id add TOCTOU
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:02:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724220208.2C05D1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723-pci_id_fix-v4-8-3580726844e1@garyguo.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] `pci_match_device()` returns a pointer to the `id` field of a dynamically allocated `struct pci_dynid` after releasing the `drv->dynids.lock` spinlock, which can result in a Use-After-Free in the probe path if the ID is concurrently removed via sysfs.
--
--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v4 8/9] PCI: Fix dyn_id add TOCTOU ---
commit b2b9cd8b65d097234cb7fc1e84df45480eb112de
Author: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
PCI: Fix dyn_id add TOCTOU
Currently there is a TOCTOU issue in new_id_store() as the dyn ID insertion
in pci_add_dynid() and the pci_match_device() are in separate critical
sections.
Fix this by moving the existing ID check to inside pci_add_dynid() and only
check against the static ID table outside the critical section.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> index c9424edb45481..ab3bb756ce89a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -153,7 +190,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id *pci_match_device(struct pci_driver *drv,
> struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> struct pci_dynid *dynid;
> - const struct pci_device_id *found_id = NULL, *ids;
> + const struct pci_device_id *found_id = NULL;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does pci_match_device() have a
use-after-free risk when returning dynamic IDs?
It looks like it returns a pointer to the id field of a dynamically allocated
struct pci_dynid after releasing the drv->dynids.lock spinlock:
pci_match_device()
spin_lock(&drv->dynids.lock);
list_for_each_entry(dynid, &drv->dynids.list, node) {
if (pci_match_one_id(&dynid->id, &dev_id)) {
found_id = &dynid->id;
break;
}
}
spin_unlock(&drv->dynids.lock);
if (found_id)
return found_id;
If remove_id_store() is triggered via sysfs concurrently, it can acquire
dynids.lock, remove the dynamic ID, and call kfree() on the structure:
remove_id_store()
list_del(&dynid->node);
kfree(dynid);
If this happens while __pci_device_probe() has matched the dynamic ID but
hasn't finished executing the driver's probe() routine, could the driver
dereference a freed struct pci_device_id?
__pci_device_probe()
id = pci_match_device(drv, pci_dev);
if (id)
error = pci_call_probe(drv, pci_dev, id);
> struct pci_device_id dev_id;
> int ret;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723-pci_id_fix-v4-0-3580726844e1@garyguo.net?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 22:00 [PATCH v4 0/9] PCI: Fix UAF and TOCTOU related to dynamic ID Gary Guo
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] ata: ata_generic: don't store pci_device_id Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] scsi: nsp32: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] ipack: tpci200: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] mlxsw: pci: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] agp/via: Don't rely on address of pci_device_id Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] agp/amd-k7: " Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] PCI: Make pci_match_one_device() match on ID instead of device Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] PCI: Fix dyn_id add TOCTOU Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-24 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-23 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] PCI: Fix UAF when probe runs concurrent to dyn ID removal Gary Guo
2026-07-24 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 22:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260724220208.2C05D1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox