From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Li Jun" <lijun01@kylinos.cn>
Cc: dlemoal@kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, cassel@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ata: ahci_da850: switch to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 06:20:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908062037.D4FCB1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908061025.3580261-1-lijun01@kylinos.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The ahci_da850 driver hooks into standard ahci_platform_resume, but fails to restore SoC-specific SATA PHY registers after suspend, causing SATA to be uninitialized on resume.
--
commit d5b66599e27a81a0e92aca89e46cdd92303b81e7
Author: Li Jun <lijun01@kylinos.cn>
ata: ahci_da850: switch to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
This patch replaces the deprecated SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS macro with the
recommended DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS. It also uses pm_ptr() to complete
the API migration and allow the pm_ops structure to be dropped when
CONFIG_PM is disabled.
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ static int ahci_da850_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ahci_da850_pm_ops, ahci_platform_suspend,
> - ahci_platform_resume);
> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ahci_da850_pm_ops, ahci_platform_suspend,
> + ahci_platform_resume);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but by examining the PM operations being wired
here, it appears the driver hooks into the generic ahci_platform_resume
without restoring SoC-specific SATA PHY registers.
During probe in drivers/ata/ahci_da850.c, ahci_da850_probe() initializes
the SATA PHY registers by calling da850_sata_init() with local parameters.
However, the resume callback is wired directly to the generic
ahci_platform_resume, which only restores standard AHCI state and bulk
clocks. It is completely unaware of the custom DA850 PHY initialization.
Furthermore, the necessary parameters for PHY initialization (pwrdn_reg and
mpy) are local to the ahci_da850_probe() function and not saved for later
use.
Could a system suspend followed by a resume cycle leave the SATA controller
uninitialized, causing connected drives to become inaccessible?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260908061025.3580261-1-lijun01@kylinos.cn?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 6:10 [PATCH v3] ata: ahci_da850: switch to DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS Li Jun
2026-09-08 6:13 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-08 8:45 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-08 9:04 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-08 6:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908062037.D4FCB1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=lijun01@kylinos.cn \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox