From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: whiteheadm@acm.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata_legacy: Allow disabling of legacy PATA device probes on non-PCI systems
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:06:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2368047.lDgGYdnaMc@amdc3058> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161129204602.GD4959@htj.duckdns.org>
Hi,
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 03:46:02 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 03:12:31PM -0500, tedheadster wrote:
> > > Can you please give a concrete example of a machine and situation
> > > where this would be useful?
> > >
> >
> >
> > Sure, my regression testing i486 system has this problem. It only has
> > an EISA bus, no PCI. I had to apply the patch to be able to put even
> > 2-3 cards in it. It had run out of IRQs.
> >
> > This testing helped uncover a long time kernel bug that now has a patch.
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?id=fc0e81b2bea0ebceb71889b61d2240856141c9ee
> >
> > Please check the linux-kernel mailing list thread "What exactly do
> > 32-bit x86 exceptions push on the stack in the CS slot?" for more
> > details.
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/19/308
>
> I see. Yeah, I don't have any objections to the change although I do
> wish it were easier / automatic. That said, given how niche it is, it
> most likely won't matter. Bartlomiej, what do you think?
I would also prefer to have such systems detected automatically
(i.e. by using DMI, please check dmidecode output on this board).
If this is not possible I'm fine with the change, though I have some
review comments to the patch itself (please see the other mail).
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-30 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-29 17:53 [PATCH] pata_legacy: Allow disabling of legacy PATA device probes on non-PCI systems Matthew Whitehead
2016-11-29 19:41 ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-29 20:12 ` tedheadster
2016-11-29 20:46 ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-30 13:06 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2016-11-30 17:13 ` tedheadster
2016-11-30 13:11 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-11-30 14:53 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-11-30 15:03 ` tedheadster
2016-11-30 18:15 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-12-02 13:37 ` tedheadster
2016-12-02 16:24 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-11-30 20:22 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <CAP8WD_bZWeLBhLXqJG5uDwBe+zBubw+A+ecSuaihOuwvw9QoCQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-12-02 17:07 ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-05 14:19 ` tedheadster
2016-12-05 19:23 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <CAP8WD_becq+h2=-g7t-6Pp1psmkCCvdB0YUcg+wYPocUP4dYdw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-12-12 17:01 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <CAP8WD_YMtnsuYmJHGz1eLmrQNemsB1Z6Soyb6f72brAfMNUNeg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-12-20 2:12 ` tedheadster
2016-12-22 16:37 ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-22 17:14 ` tedheadster
2016-12-22 17:19 ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-22 18:30 ` tedheadster
2016-12-22 19:22 ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-03 17:34 ` One Thousand Gnomes
[not found] ` <CAP8WD_bS61spyQkd7cvktFf_dPc0wgNZ8qEa7GVrXgUobHQdvw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-01-19 21:37 ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-20 17:08 ` tedheadster
2017-01-20 19:19 ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-20 19:38 ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-23 23:36 ` Gwendal Grignou
2017-01-23 23:57 ` tedheadster
2017-01-24 16:19 ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-27 3:01 ` tedheadster
2017-02-07 20:21 ` Gwendal Grignou
2017-02-08 19:43 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-09 23:49 ` Gwendal Grignou
2017-02-10 0:36 ` tedheadster
2017-02-10 13:19 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-23 19:26 ` tedheadster
2017-03-03 17:00 ` [PATCH] libata: transport: Remove circular dependency at free time Gwendal Grignou
2017-03-03 18:28 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2017-03-03 18:36 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-06 20:09 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-06 20:11 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2017-03-06 20:26 ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-24 15:57 ` [PATCH] pata_legacy: Allow disabling of legacy PATA device probes on non-PCI systems Tejun Heo
2016-12-12 12:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-11-30 13:12 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-11-30 13:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2368047.lDgGYdnaMc@amdc3058 \
--to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=whiteheadm@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox