Re: Do we still need the scsi IPR driver ?

[Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>]

On 6/22/22 05:52, Brian King wrote:
> On 6/21/22 3:36 PM, Brian King wrote:
>> On 6/19/22 11:48 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>>
>>> Polling people here: Do we still need the scsi IPR driver for IBM Power
>>> Linux RAID adapters (IBM iSeries: 5702, 5703, 2780, 5709, 570A, 570B
>>> adapters) ?
>>>
>>> The reason I am asking is because this driver is the *only* libsas/ata
>>> driver that does not define a ->error_handler port operation. If this
>>> driver is removed, or if it is modified to use a ->error_handler operation
>>> to handle failed commands, then a lot of code simplification can be done
>>> in libata, which I am trying to do to facilitate the processing of some
>>> special error completion for commands using a command duration limit.
>>
>> We still need it around for now. IBM still sells these adapters
>> and they can still be ordered even on our latest Power 10 systems.
> 
> At one point I did look into modifying ipr to use an ->error_handler.
> I recall I ran into some issues that resulted in this getting put
> on the shelf, but its been a while. I'll go dig that code up and
> see what it looks like.

Thanks. It would be really great if you can convert to using
error_handler. This is really the last ata/libsas driver that does not use
this.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brian
> 
> 


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research