From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73389C4708E for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 12:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229449AbjADMiO (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2023 07:38:14 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56548 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239259AbjADMht (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2023 07:37:49 -0500 Received: from esa1.hgst.iphmx.com (esa1.hgst.iphmx.com [68.232.141.245]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF15918384 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 04:37:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1672835866; x=1704371866; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FnrCvyGU8eSnbHP81ntl0TkHG/Rndm8KPRS5Mzaqcrg=; b=MibVGuAOmawgel/7pzTRu8kKIGn939GiSfNJF6W+0Gj2uYlZ6KGXX0xv dx3/oetL1ptbC2lthuOJQDDDrVL9uiFScbYsrgi+5DXQsSca7nH7rTokv 2/63qvz5IzFYy7QsAcqWus4SYtAQYCWmiG4PyUQ0DZZbSuayMBMqr6whR RQuYSfwfRjEeOpw+o1GQKp05sVUv+aLQfyaYAUXnZtKWGresTYXB+usDS vB9KRB8pGD8wdT8E64PzpMfHL7/bhR9yL8G3+bolIWZrCxWsWJKkG/erg Xk/aLEHx9SA+weC0z1U1NqPgnoXrqxECFOQNLN05vivEqMdhOaKaBXZPK g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,299,1665417600"; d="scan'208";a="332005535" Received: from h199-255-45-14.hgst.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.14]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2023 20:37:41 +0800 IronPort-SDR: iT9dsutUgf1eHxjvs3vjC8lTm3ZT9SylQnJ9zbez/kXjvdvQ8AWE0coQCojkZUGQJ7qr0WXDRE JqLxDpdAFz5kt/szY9JR1G0SLJN6k2Kc4uD7PrU84oSZ7yfeDh9awYtq+bcAE2rhnheyQ5Nf5s 3nzZt7C+DhUPaZ78l5YZnl2ZOkkQy3mCajCmLQMtO6rLvxtbkXiCXVxd0Jy3gAukTn/gBcIesp tRRTIIN3Maf7ORewNzn+f//sjMZ5e68kh1Y+l3Hud0M1eUyIbzjdjo0jmX2NzDPlL9WSoaFYKm QmU= Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 04 Jan 2023 03:55:38 -0800 IronPort-SDR: B1wCOtTOMbHz39Q9GLzY3VmyYW8CTTCiqBm1W39sql9dUgB810WlZK/p0SmeUhKTAM6uI65Z65 HdLjsf0DxbLtzMedeihC9UYvOoRtcQVv6eDNveC92iHznY7LkT3/ylpuIuEsqIn0YMBJkJAmRj 4mA10n8rqEmg1F7wIemuWew4CHwPCePhUcD4CqqQEqIXdPc2n/yCKWw3Ym9QhV6bi7dsebwlN9 31yv1iFoxYie/DJSmO/oRdRjfkzZUhN15UtXkqCH24WUihDjA+xQq6tmMQA86IJj4QLkuf/Wia jHA= WDCIronportException: Internal Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com ([10.3.10.180]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 04 Jan 2023 04:37:42 -0800 Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Nn8JP32Vmz1RwtC for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 04:37:41 -0800 (PST) Authentication-Results: usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=opensource.wdc.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= opensource.wdc.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :in-reply-to:organization:from:references:to:content-language :subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id; s=dkim; t= 1672835860; x=1675427861; bh=FnrCvyGU8eSnbHP81ntl0TkHG/Rndm8KPRS 5Mzaqcrg=; b=S3Oa2SKPsXtscIo1kzIO1m8vSr9fg+0g0MBrhfUGdO6XRuYXqQZ 5OHQTiL9g0BhY0GpZ41iJ6fcIOk9UMaClrfRJE32NzajeLysMdWEfDxLRJj/33x6 eZrzrkdinp8OKRHc1vj3rwvWKw3Fg2EnEY0pVDOrngSNsUTPz1j/Rmd0lmhk0fWj pH5jqVfliWAa2Aeg4enaFfobotZPkQld35eerZOzuf9q+dDGxg724A+8C6BGJigQ +j2y+HHEycpyHe3D0el/kEhBKknPnBXu5LZY/nlefpIGWSXgLa9jb/0Tsu5cM1FL vOYx1Fxz/3j0TGbGz0r9nobDQCnIe2SlN9w== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id EtDIORCRcCOx for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 04:37:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.225.163.5] (unknown [10.225.163.5]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Nn8JM3jKgz1RvLy; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 04:37:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3fa9835f-62d3-70f0-d4a2-57dd429029d9@opensource.wdc.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 21:37:38 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] misc libata improvements Content-Language: en-US To: Niklas Cassel Cc: Mikael Pettersson , Brian King , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" References: <20221229170005.49118-1-niklas.cassel@wdc.com> <49c92e50-5452-8c3e-1517-a0bb1e4e72a0@opensource.wdc.com> From: Damien Le Moal Organization: Western Digital Research In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On 1/4/23 19:16, Niklas Cassel wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 01:43:54PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: >>> On 12/30/22 01:59, Niklas Cassel wrote: >>>> Hello there, >>>> >>>> This series contains misc libata improvements. >>>> >>>> These improvements were identified while developing support for Command >>>> Duration Limits (CDL). All patches in this series (i.e. V1 of these >>>> patches) were orignally sent out as part of the CDL series, found here: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/510732e0-7962-cf54-c22c-f1d7066895f5@opensource.wdc.com/T/ >>>> >>>> However, as these improvements are completely unrelated to CDL, they can >>>> be merged independently, and should not need to wait for other patches. >>> >>> Applied the series to for-6.3. Patch 1 had a small conflict that I fixed >>> up. Thanks ! >> >> I had a look at the SHA1 for this patch in your tree, and it looks good. >> >> However, patches 2/7, 3/7, 4/7, 7/7 seem to miss your chain sign-off. > > Is this perhaps because checkpatch complains if the same sign-off exists > twice on the same patch? > > Not sure if this should be ignored or not... > To me, it seems more important to keep a record of the chain, > than to keep checkpatch happy, but I could be wrong here.. I do not sign again patches that already have my SoB. linux-next build bot will complain if I forget signing patches I apply, but it does not seem that the order matters... Not entirely certain about the correct practice with that though. > > > Kind regards, > Niklas -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research