From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix Silicon Image SATA 4-port support Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:52:34 -0500 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <403D0B12.5090606@pobox.com> References: <403C4E73.9030805@pobox.com> <403C8EDC.1030905@stesmi.com> <403CF946.2080708@pobox.com> <403D0A7E.6080500@stesmi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:36034 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261464AbUBYUws (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:52:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <403D0A7E.6080500@stesmi.com> List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Smietanowski Cc: Linux Kernel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Stefan Smietanowski wrote: > Hi Jeff. > >>>> Do not be fooled, Silicon Image is still marked CONFIG_BROKEN for a >>>> reason... :) But this should (hopefully!) get 4-port support going. >>>> >>>> Testing requested... >>> >>> >>> Care to elaborate on what's left to do until you're satisfied with it? >>> >>> And are the issues general (all chips) or specific to some chips? >> >> >> Just specific to Silicon Image, which is the only thing marked >> CONFIG_BROKEN. It needs to acknowledge more interrupts than it >> currently does. >> >> Jeff >> >> > > Ok, the question was "specific to all SiI chips or only to some, or > maybe only to some boards or revisions" since it was about SiI... > > But I take your second sentance to mean all chips and boards. All Silicon Image boards / chips. Jeff