linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sata_via: ata1 failed to respond
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:52:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40633890.80009@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040325164441.GP1756@master.mivlgu.local>

Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I have another report about nonworking sata_via in 2.4.25-libata9
> plus the probing bug fix (so sata_via was identical to the version
> in 2.4.25-libata12).  The drive was not recognised with these
> messages:
> 
> libata version 1.02 loaded.
> sata_via version 0.20
> sata_via(00:0f.0): routed to hard irq line 10
> ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB800 ctl 0xB402 bmdma 0xA400 irq 20
> ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB000 ctl 0xA802 bmdma 0xA408 irq 20
> ata1 is slow to respond, please be patient
> ata1 failed to respond (30 secs)
> 
> The hardware was: ASUS A7V600 motherboard, Seagate ST3120026AS hard
> drive.  2.4.25-libata1 worked fine.
> 
> acpi=off and noapic options did not help.  However, replacing
> sata_via.c with the version from 2.4.25-libata1 (with removed
> ".phy_config = pata_phy_config" line to make it compile) allowed the
> detection to succeed.
> 
> I tried to replace ATA_FLAG_SATA_RESET with ATA_FLAG_SRST in the new
> driver - with this change detection also succeeds:
> 
> --- kernel-source-2.4.25/drivers/scsi/sata_via.c.via-srst	2004-03-24 16:27:50 +0300
> +++ kernel-source-2.4.25/drivers/scsi/sata_via.c	2004-03-25 18:51:19 +0300
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int svia_init_one (struct pci_dev
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&probe_ent->node);
>  	probe_ent->pdev = pdev;
>  	probe_ent->sht = &svia_sht;
> -	probe_ent->host_flags = ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_SATA_RESET |
> +	probe_ent->host_flags = ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_SRST |
>  				ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY;
>  	probe_ent->port_ops = &svia_sata_ops;
>  	probe_ent->n_ports = 2;


Just FYI, I went ahead and committed this patch, and created -libata14 
patch (and sent this to Linus).

I would rather the main tree have working code, from which we will then 
(attempt to) advance.

	Jeff




      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-25 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-25 16:44 sata_via: ata1 failed to respond Sergey Vlasov
2004-03-25 17:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-25 19:52 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40633890.80009@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).