* Status of the sata_sil driver for the VT8237
@ 2004-03-28 2:10 J. Ryan Earl
2004-03-28 3:16 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: J. Ryan Earl @ 2004-03-28 2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-ide
I was wondering, what is the state of the sata_sil driver for the VIA
VT8237 southbridge (ie the one used commonly on their K8T
motherboards). Is this still beta? Any known problems with it?
-ryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of the sata_sil driver for the VT8237
2004-03-28 2:10 Status of the sata_sil driver for the VT8237 J. Ryan Earl
@ 2004-03-28 3:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-28 3:47 ` J. Ryan Earl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-03-28 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Ryan Earl; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-ide
J. Ryan Earl wrote:
> I was wondering, what is the state of the sata_sil driver for the VIA
> VT8237 southbridge (ie the one used commonly on their K8T
> motherboards). Is this still beta? Any known problems with it?
Well prior to the most recent version, calling it "beta" was putting it
kindly. I would call it broken :) which was why it was marked with
CONFIG_BROKEN...
As of the most recent 2.6.5-rc2-bk snapshots, libata and sata_sil should
be pretty happy with each other.
Some of the VIA problems were actually platform-related. "noapic",
"nomce", turning -on- local APIC support, and a few other workarounds
have been found for these.
If you're on x86-64, make sure you have the latest BIOS version, too.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of the sata_sil driver for the VT8237
2004-03-28 3:16 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-03-28 3:47 ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-03-28 7:37 ` Stefan Smietanowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: J. Ryan Earl @ 2004-03-28 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-ide
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> J. Ryan Earl wrote:
>
>> I was wondering, what is the state of the sata_sil driver for the VIA
>> VT8237 southbridge (ie the one used commonly on their K8T
>> motherboards). Is this still beta? Any known problems with it?
>
>
> Well prior to the most recent version, calling it "beta" was putting
> it kindly. I would call it broken :) which was why it was marked with
> CONFIG_BROKEN...
>
> As of the most recent 2.6.5-rc2-bk snapshots, libata and sata_sil
> should be pretty happy with each other.
I meant sata_via, I dunno why I said sata_sil; Freudian typo. I was
thinking of the current sii3112 I use, which has been stable and
blazingly fast for awhile with the IDE driver--and a little little patch
I keep applying. I'm looking to upgrade a server with 2 Raptors in it
to an A64 running 64-bit Linux of course. I wanna get the HDs off the
PCI bus and onto the VT8237 southbridge. I was wondering if the driver
for -that southbridge- was still considered beta.
-ryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of the sata_sil driver for the VT8237
2004-03-28 3:47 ` J. Ryan Earl
@ 2004-03-28 7:37 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-28 7:48 ` J. Ryan Earl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Smietanowski @ 2004-03-28 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Ryan Earl; +Cc: Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, linux-ide
Hi.
> I meant sata_via, I dunno why I said sata_sil; Freudian typo. I was
> thinking of the current sii3112 I use, which has been stable and
> blazingly fast for awhile with the IDE driver--and a little little patch
> I keep applying. I'm looking to upgrade a server with 2 Raptors in it
> to an A64 running 64-bit Linux of course. I wanna get the HDs off the
> PCI bus and onto the VT8237 southbridge. I was wondering if the driver
> for -that southbridge- was still considered beta.
Many A64 boards today come with a Promise SATA controller as well -
works like a charm for me on an ASUS K8V Deluxe board here.
The driver is sata_promise but I guess you either knew that or
would be able to figure it out yourself :)
// Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of the sata_sil driver for the VT8237
2004-03-28 7:37 ` Stefan Smietanowski
@ 2004-03-28 7:48 ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-03-28 20:22 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: J. Ryan Earl @ 2004-03-28 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Smietanowski; +Cc: Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, linux-ide
Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> Many A64 boards today come with a Promise SATA controller as well -
> works like a charm for me on an ASUS K8V Deluxe board here.
That's an option, as is just using the sii3112 that's been working so
well, but that still puts the disks on the PCI bus. The whole point is
to get 300MB/sec of burstable I/O off the 133MB/s bus that's shared with
the dual gigE controllers and a firewire camera.
-ryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of the sata_sil driver for the VT8237
2004-03-28 7:48 ` J. Ryan Earl
@ 2004-03-28 20:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-28 20:40 ` J. Ryan Earl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-03-28 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Ryan Earl; +Cc: Stefan Smietanowski, linux-kernel, linux-ide
J. Ryan Earl wrote:
> Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
>
>> Many A64 boards today come with a Promise SATA controller as well -
>> works like a charm for me on an ASUS K8V Deluxe board here.
>
>
> That's an option, as is just using the sii3112 that's been working so
> well, but that still puts the disks on the PCI bus. The whole point is
> to get 300MB/sec of burstable I/O off the 133MB/s bus that's shared with
> the dual gigE controllers and a firewire camera.
Do you really plan to get 300MB/sec from two disks? :)
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of the sata_sil driver for the VT8237
2004-03-28 20:22 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-03-28 20:40 ` J. Ryan Earl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: J. Ryan Earl @ 2004-03-28 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-ide
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Do you really plan to get 300MB/sec from two disks? :)
Yes, for about 50-100ms at a time, and -to- the disks, not from them;
well, the caches anyway. On 133MB/s PCI, more like 150-300ms of
saturation on bursts, and shared with the NICs. I have very short and
bursty I/O patterns as is typical in real-time applications. It's
easier to guarantee latency when your pipes are always at a small
fraction of their potential. 100ms higher latency, even for part of a
second, is quite noticeable in what I serve.
-ryan
PS 2.6 dropped my latencies under load by about 90% over 2.4! We're
talking 40-80ms application response time under high load to 8-10ms
under high load. <3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-28 20:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-28 2:10 Status of the sata_sil driver for the VT8237 J. Ryan Earl
2004-03-28 3:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-28 3:47 ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-03-28 7:37 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-28 7:48 ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-03-28 20:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-28 20:40 ` J. Ryan Earl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).