From: cira <linux@spishack.com>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: poor sata performance on 2.6
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:46:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40801BFC.3090702@spishack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200404161748.38958.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Friday 16 April 2004 04:05, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>It seems like the situation is already resolved, to me.
>>
>>When you mount a filesystem, it changes the default block size (512 or
>>1024) to the filesystem block size, normally 4096. This would certainly
>>increase the throughput.
>
>
> Yes, this works.
>
> But if one uses unpartitioned disk, why does (s)he need to
> do some blocksize tricks before hdparm starts to measure good performance?
> I think that in this case block layer can coalesce small read requests
> into large ones regardless of block size.
debian unstable
kernel 2.6.5 with udev
promise sata150 tx4
dual seagate ST3120026AS (120GB)
libata 1.02
sata_promise 0.91
Thank you all!
I use lvm2 with /dev/sda and /dev/sdb as members of my volume group.
That means, no partition tables. The logical volume contains a
ReiserFS. Once the logical volume is mounted the higher transfer rates
are seen.
22 root@chaljin:/mnt # mount /dev/sdb1 sdb1
23 root@chaljin:/mnt # mount | grep sdb
/dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 on /mnt/sdb1 type ext2 (rw)
24 root@chaljin:/mnt # hdparm -t /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 32 MB in 3.04 seconds = 10.52 MB/sec
25 root@chaljin:/mnt # hdparm -t /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 166 MB in 3.02 seconds = 54.98 MB/sec
26 root@chaljin:/mnt # umount /dev/sdb1
Ah, the change is not stable either. If I umount the partition it
reverts to the slower rate. There is no need to reboot.
> Konstantin, does dd give you the same behaviour as hdparm?
> --
> vda
Yes, dd does behave the same as hdparm.
39 root@chaljin:/root # dd bs=512 count=65536 if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
33554432 bytes transferred in 3.203750 seconds (10473487 bytes/sec)
40 root@chaljin:/root # cd /mnt
41 root@chaljin:/mnt # mount /dev/sdb1 sdb1
42 root@chaljin:/mnt # dd bs=512 count=65536 if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
33554432 bytes transferred in 3.184339 seconds (10537330 bytes/sec)
43 root@chaljin:/mnt # dd bs=512 count=65536 if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
33554432 bytes transferred in 0.400394 seconds (83803552 bytes/sec)
44 root@chaljin:/mnt # dd bs=512 count=339968 if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null
339968+0 records in
339968+0 records out
174063616 bytes transferred in 2.705558 seconds (64335569 bytes/sec)
45 root@chaljin:/mnt #
If anyone wants further testing just let me know. I still have one
blank disk and one promise sata150 tx4 controller that is not yet in use.
-cira
(I'm on the linux-ide list)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-16 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-14 22:36 poor sata performance on 2.6 Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 3:54 ` Ryan Geoffrey Bourgeois
2004-04-15 10:55 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 12:02 ` Justin Cormack
2004-04-15 13:34 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 14:00 ` Justin Cormack
2004-04-15 14:26 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 14:33 ` Justin Cormack
2004-04-15 14:48 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 14:52 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-04-15 15:08 ` Justin Cormack
2004-04-15 15:16 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-23 4:50 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-04-15 17:30 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-16 1:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-16 14:48 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-16 16:59 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-16 17:46 ` cira [this message]
2004-04-20 12:41 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-04-15 15:51 ` Ryan Geoffrey Bourgeois
2004-04-15 23:34 ` Simon Koch
2004-04-16 0:11 ` poor sata performance on 2.6 - Promise SX4 Ryan Geoffrey Bourgeois
2004-04-16 1:03 ` poor sata performance on 2.6 Jeff Garzik
2004-04-15 7:12 ` Lenar Lõhmus
2004-04-15 10:40 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 12:37 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-15 13:05 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 19:50 ` Pavel Machek
2004-04-15 21:13 ` Konstantin Sobolev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40801BFC.3090702@spishack.com \
--to=linux@spishack.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).