From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata atapi work #5
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 16:29:05 -0400
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <40A52C11.5010707@pobox.com>
References: <1084560167.8752.7.camel@patibmrh9> <40A5195C.2000402@pobox.com>	<1084562845.8752.37.camel@patibmrh9>  <40A5225B.9000907@pobox.com> <1084564801.3084.13.camel@patibmrh9> <40A528FE.8040301@pobox.com> <40A52ADC.6060600@mailcan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:38849 "EHLO
	www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262606AbUENU3S
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 14 May 2004 16:29:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <40A52ADC.6060600@mailcan.com>
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Leon Woestenberg <leonw@mailcan.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> Hello Jeff,
> 
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>> All good EE designs are concurrent rather than sequential ;-)
>>
>> But I'm a computer scientist, what do I know...
> 
>  >
> A rough guess: POSIX Threads :-)
> 
> And yes, that's IE*EE* POSIX Threads ;-)

hehe.

Well, I actually don't like threads...  but down at the hardware level, 
circuits are inherently parallel.

	Jeff