From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-core when not ata_id_use_dmadir despite yes SiliconI mage Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 12:39:57 -0400 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <40A647DD.4020601@pobox.com> References: <1084630807.5082.42.camel@patibmrh9> <200405151633.10473.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <40A64229.7000600@pobox.com> <200405151838.15898.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:6814 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264695AbUEOQkM (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 May 2004 12:40:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200405151838.15898.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Pat LaVarre , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Saturday 15 of May 2004 18:15, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>We can do so for our development here, but a better solution based on >>released parts will need to be found... > > > Do you know of some way to detect SI 3611CT80 1.4? Not right now. I need to see the full IDENTIFY PACKET DEVICE data to discover a way... (and I need to write some code before libata dumps the full identify-device page) Other bridges add an identifying string to the -end- of the ATA device's model name, maybe SiI does too. Jeff