linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "B. M. Shea" <imbshea-spam@yahoo.com>
To: Linux IDE Mailing List <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: VIA and /dev/sdX <---> /dev/hdX with 2.6
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:24:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40FEC2F5.20605@yahoo.com> (raw)



Dear LINUX-IDE,

I have burned a new ISO for the Slackware v10 crowd(and a boot disk for 
that matter) to use SATA. It is simply "libata" patched against 2.4.26 
(default kernel for Slack v10 install). It automatically installs the 
kernel with the patch (This and a few minor script changes were really 
the only changes I made.)
Anyway, it is working flawlessly unless you have the VIA chipset and 
start using a 2.6.x kernel. People with VIA (specifically) have been 
having the device change from /dev/sdX to /dev/hdX. after compiling a 
new kernel to use VIA as a Low level SCSI driver.

I have examined a couple of their CONFIG's and haven't seen any problems 
with that. Is this a known 'condition' in these kernels? Jeff do you 
know anything about this? I know I have written you on this before, but 
for the life of me, I cannot find any info on this anywhere on the web. 
Just stuff about what I just described and how people can't seem to fix 
it. The drives seems to 'work' after being discovered as HD 
devices...But on other forums I have read they tend to be 'unreliable' - 
whatever that means. I have told them to try the 'boot: 
noprobe=/dev/hde' option, but I am not sure if this has let libata 
discover them as SCSI...(I haven't heard back from anyone yet about 
this.) Any idea's or have I missed some important information on the 2.6 
kernel somewhere?

Sincerely,

Brady Shea



-- 
-Sig:-
PGP/GPG Key [Server Lookup]:
0x06E3769E22BB70A7
or just go here:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x22BB70A7
-End of Signature-

                 reply	other threads:[~2004-07-21 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40FEC2F5.20605@yahoo.com \
    --to=imbshea-spam@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).