From: Brad Campbell <brad@wasp.net.au>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata ATA vs SATA detection and workaround.
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:17:53 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41336141.7010407@wasp.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <413357AE.3000009@pobox.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 779 bytes --]
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> For now I think moving your code to ata_dev_config() function is
> sufficient, with one modification:
>
> Move the
> ((ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_SATA) && (!ata_id_is_sata(ap->device)))
> test into a separate function all its own, "ata_knobble_device" or
> somesuch. static inline if you wish.
>
> Then it will be trivial to add a 'knobble' module parm later on, by
> simply modifying ata_knobble_device() to also check the module parameter
> in addition to the existing tests.
Pretty new at kernel code. (And C for that matter)
I did note that it appears it's not going to do the right thing if we have more than one device per
host, but I guess thats not going to be an issue for SATA for the near future anyway.
How's this grab you?
Regards,
Brad
[-- Attachment #2: diff3 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2939 bytes --]
diff -ur orig/linux-2.6.0/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c linux-2.6.9-rc1/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
--- orig/linux-2.6.0/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2004-08-30 20:48:35.000000000 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc1/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2004-08-30 21:02:42.000000000 +0400
@@ -1128,6 +1128,37 @@
DPRINTK("EXIT, err\n");
}
+
+static inline u8 ata_dev_knobble(struct ata_port *ap)
+{
+ return ((ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_SATA) && (!ata_id_is_sata(ap->device)));
+}
+
+/**
+ * ata_dev_config - Run device specific handlers and check for
+ * SATA->PATA bridges
+ * @ap: Bus
+ * @i: Device
+ *
+ * LOCKING:
+ */
+
+void ata_dev_config(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int i)
+{
+ /* limit bridge transfers to udma5, 200 sectors */
+ if (ata_dev_knobble(ap)) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "ata%u(%u): applying bridge limits\n",
+ ap->id, ap->device->devno);
+ ap->udma_mask &= ATA_UDMA5;
+ ap->host->max_sectors = ATA_MAX_SECTORS;
+ ap->host->hostt->max_sectors = ATA_MAX_SECTORS;
+ ap->device->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_LOCK_SECTORS;
+ }
+
+ if (ap->ops->dev_config)
+ ap->ops->dev_config(ap, &ap->device[i]);
+}
+
/**
* ata_bus_probe - Reset and probe ATA bus
* @ap: Bus to probe
@@ -1150,8 +1181,7 @@
ata_dev_identify(ap, i);
if (ata_dev_present(&ap->device[i])) {
found = 1;
- if (ap->ops->dev_config)
- ap->ops->dev_config(ap, &ap->device[i]);
+ ata_dev_config(ap,i);
}
}
@@ -1226,7 +1256,7 @@
ata_port_disable(ap);
return;
}
-
+ ap->cbl = ATA_CBL_SATA;
ata_bus_reset(ap);
}
@@ -3567,3 +3597,4 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_scsi_release);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_host_intr);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_dev_id_string);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_dev_config);
nly in linux-2.6.9-rc1/include: config
diff -ur orig/linux-2.6.0/include/linux/ata.h linux-2.6.9-rc1/include/linux/ata.h
--- orig/linux-2.6.0/include/linux/ata.h 2004-08-30 20:48:35.000000000 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc1/include/linux/ata.h 2004-08-30 18:42:41.000000000 +0400
@@ -218,6 +218,7 @@
};
#define ata_id_is_ata(dev) (((dev)->id[0] & (1 << 15)) == 0)
+#define ata_id_is_sata(dev) ((dev)->id[93] == 0)
#define ata_id_rahead_enabled(dev) ((dev)->id[85] & (1 << 6))
#define ata_id_wcache_enabled(dev) ((dev)->id[85] & (1 << 5))
#define ata_id_has_flush(dev) ((dev)->id[83] & (1 << 12))
diff -ur orig/linux-2.6.0/include/linux/libata.h linux-2.6.9-rc1/include/linux/libata.h
--- orig/linux-2.6.0/include/linux/libata.h 2004-08-30 20:48:35.000000000 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc1/include/linux/libata.h 2004-08-30 20:42:05.000000000 +0400
@@ -400,6 +400,7 @@
unsigned int n_elem);
extern void ata_dev_id_string(struct ata_device *dev, unsigned char *s,
unsigned int ofs, unsigned int len);
+extern void ata_dev_config(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int i);
extern void ata_bmdma_setup_mmio (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
extern void ata_bmdma_start_mmio (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
extern void ata_bmdma_setup_pio (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-29 17:09 libata dev_config call order wrong Brad Campbell
2004-08-29 17:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-29 17:47 ` Brad Campbell
2004-08-29 17:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-29 18:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-29 18:59 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-30 9:12 ` Brad Campbell
2004-08-30 13:22 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-30 14:38 ` Brad Campbell
2004-08-30 14:42 ` [PATCH] libata ATA vs SATA detection and workaround Brad Campbell
2004-08-30 14:57 ` Brad Campbell
2004-08-30 16:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-30 16:34 ` Brad Campbell
2004-08-30 16:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-30 17:17 ` Brad Campbell [this message]
2004-08-30 17:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-31 7:47 ` Brad Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41336141.7010407@wasp.net.au \
--to=brad@wasp.net.au \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).