From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: libata & scsi rescan. Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 23:59:32 -0400 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <4164BF24.8090303@pobox.com> References: <20041001123951.A23006@florence.linkmargin.com> <415DA2C0.3060600@pobox.com> <20041001141244.B23006@florence.linkmargin.com> <415DB03E.5090005@pobox.com> <20041004155647.A9589@florence.linkmargin.com> <4161BB01.5080607@pobox.com> <20041006173656.A18221@florence.linkmargin.com> <416496CC.4090105@pobox.com> <20041006214746.A18793@florence.linkmargin.com> <4164B548.7030700@pobox.com> <20041006224929.B18793@florence.linkmargin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:45194 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269675AbUJGD7p (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2004 23:59:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20041006224929.B18793@florence.linkmargin.com> List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Warner Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Doug Ledford Andy Warner wrote: > Is it also true that the standard SATA control, error and > status registers exist and function pretty much as the > spec says (at least for (1 << 16) in error and the > IPM & DET fields in Status) ? SStatus and SControl yes. The SError register seems to be for error conditions only; no mention of PhyRdy being directly manipulated. Jeff