From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: libata vs ATAPI Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:46:33 -0400 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <416C50B9.2030703@pobox.com> References: <58cb370e04101213215ce9a23c@mail.gmail.com> <416C438C.4010902@pobox.com> <58cb370e0410121417591ecff0@mail.gmail.com> <416C4CDE.40704@pobox.com> <58cb370e04101214392a8aae4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:13237 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267939AbUJLVqr (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:46:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <58cb370e04101214392a8aae4@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Linux IDE , Jens Axboe Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:30:06 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>Another for the todo list: >> >>ATAPI PIO data xfer should _read_ bcount, to determine how many bytes to >>read. I forget if I do this, but I don't think so... > > > atapi_pio_sector() does it... Ah yes. Well, don't add that to the todo list then :) Jeff