From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [patch] scsi/libata: correct bug for ULi M5281 Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:15:39 -0500 Message-ID: <41BB475B.1000202@pobox.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:21132 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261998AbULKTPo (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:15:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Clear.Zhang@uli.com.tw Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, andrebalsa@mailingaddress.org, Peer.Chen@uli.com.tw, Emily.Jiang@uli.com.tw, Eric.Lo@uli.com.tw Clear.Zhang@uli.com.tw wrote: > Hi, Jeff > > The sata_uli patch for m5281 looks fine,but some of M5281 chip's PHY > is not stable sometime, so it need a workaround to correct the bug. > > patch_M5281workaround is just for it. > > The patch is applied to kernel 2.6.9. Pleases apply to new kernels, thanks > a lot. > > Signed-off-by: Clear Zhang I'm afraid I must reject this patch. We do not wish to put hardware-specific workarounds in libata-core.c or libata-scsi.c. I would suggest either (a) finding a way to add the workaround to sata_uli.c, or (b) finding the "root cause" of the problem, and determine why the libata code is insufficient. Two suggestions I have while investigating your problem: 1) Replacing the ->phy_reset() hook may allow you to solve the problem in sata_uli.c. 2) It is entirely possible that we need to add additional error handling code to libata, including hooks back into the low-level driver (such as sata_uli.c). Regards, Jeff