linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
@ 2005-01-11 19:53 maximilian attems
  2005-01-12 12:02 ` Philip Armstrong
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: maximilian attems @ 2005-01-11 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ide; +Cc: B.Zolnierkiewicz, 289770, Philip Armstrong


dma on a thinkpad  600E worked for 2.6.8, but didn't since 2.6.9
also non working 2.6.10.

-hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63, UDMA(33)
+hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63

could you please look at the following ide dma bug report for piix in
debian -> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289770
full dmesg of both 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 are posted there.

thanks maks


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
  2005-01-11 19:53 (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad maximilian attems
@ 2005-01-12 12:02 ` Philip Armstrong
  2005-01-12 12:52   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Philip Armstrong @ 2005-01-12 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: maximilian attems; +Cc: linux-ide, B.Zolnierkiewicz, 289770

On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 08:53:45PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> dma on a thinkpad  600E worked for 2.6.8, but didn't since 2.6.9
> also non working 2.6.10.
> 
> -hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63, UDMA(33)
> +hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63
> 
> could you please look at the following ide dma bug report for piix in
> debian -> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289770
> full dmesg of both 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 are posted there.

Incidentally, this may be the same bug as Debian bug #284558:

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284558

which involves more recent PIIX hardware.

Phil

-- 
http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
  2005-01-12 12:02 ` Philip Armstrong
@ 2005-01-12 12:52   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  2005-01-12 12:58     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
                       ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2005-01-12 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philip Armstrong; +Cc: maximilian attems, linux-ide, 289770

On Wednesday 12 January 2005 13:02, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 08:53:45PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > dma on a thinkpad  600E worked for 2.6.8, but didn't since 2.6.9
> > also non working 2.6.10.
> > 
> > -hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63, UDMA(33)
> > +hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63
> > 
> > could you please look at the following ide dma bug report for piix in
> > debian -> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289770
> > full dmesg of both 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 are posted there.

"something" steals resource needed for IDE driver so no DMA

> Incidentally, this may be the same bug as Debian bug #284558:
> 
>   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284558
> 
> which involves more recent PIIX hardware.

this one is an user error, ide_generic driver shouldn't be used
at the same time as piix driver

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
  2005-01-12 12:52   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2005-01-12 12:58     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  2005-01-12 13:35     ` Philip Armstrong
                       ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2005-01-12 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philip Armstrong; +Cc: maximilian attems, linux-ide, 289770

On Wednesday 12 January 2005 13:52, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2005 13:02, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 08:53:45PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > dma on a thinkpad  600E worked for 2.6.8, but didn't since 2.6.9
> > > also non working 2.6.10.
> > > 
> > > -hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63, UDMA(33)
> > > +hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63
> > > 
> > > could you please look at the following ide dma bug report for piix in
> > > debian -> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289770
> > > full dmesg of both 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 are posted there.
> 
> "something" steals resource needed for IDE driver so no DMA
> 
> > Incidentally, this may be the same bug as Debian bug #284558:
> > 
> >   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284558
> > 
> > which involves more recent PIIX hardware.
> 
> this one is an user error, ide_generic driver shouldn't be used
> at the same time as piix driver

sorry, not an user error, it looks like a bug in distribution
(ide_generic shouldn't be loaded unconditionally!)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
  2005-01-12 12:52   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  2005-01-12 12:58     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2005-01-12 13:35     ` Philip Armstrong
  2005-01-12 13:46       ` Prarit Bhargava
  2005-01-12 13:48       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  2005-02-10 20:02     ` Philip Armstrong
  2005-02-10 20:08     ` Philip Armstrong
  3 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Philip Armstrong @ 2005-01-12 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz; +Cc: maximilian attems, linux-ide, 289770

On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> "something" steals resource needed for IDE driver so no DMA

Does the kernel know what the 'something' is? Should I be routing
around in /proc looking for something specific?

cheers,

Phil

-- 
http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
  2005-01-12 13:35     ` Philip Armstrong
@ 2005-01-12 13:46       ` Prarit Bhargava
  2005-01-12 13:50         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  2005-01-12 17:56         ` Philip Armstrong
  2005-01-12 13:48       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Prarit Bhargava @ 2005-01-12 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philip Armstrong
  Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, maximilian attems, linux-ide, 289770

Philip and Bartlomiej,

I've been tracking an almost identical problem on my IA64 platform with 
a bk pull that is about a month old. 

I tracked it down to a duplicate vector request of 0x38 = 56 by the 
mmtimer -- take a look at /proc/interrupts, /proc/ioports, /proc/iomem 
and see if anything has requested the specific area that your CD is 
trying to get.

My output looked like:

SGIIOC4: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:01:01.0, revision 79
ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc00001080c200140-0xc00001080c200163
Probing IDE interface ide0...
hda: MATSHITADVD-ROM SR-8588, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide0: Disabled unable to get IRQ 56.
Probing IDE interface ide0...
hda: MATSHITADVD-ROM SR-8588, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
hda: IRQ probe failed (0x4ffffffe)
Probing IDE interface ide1...
ide1: Wait for ready failed before probe !
Probing IDE interface ide2...
ide2: Wait for ready failed before probe !
Probing IDE interface ide3...
ide3: Wait for ready failed before probe !
Probing IDE interface ide4...
ide4: Wait for ready failed before probe !
Probing IDE interface ide5...
ide5: Wait for ready failed before probe !
ide0: DISABLED, NO IRQ

Bartlomiej, just a thought:

I think that the output of the failures of the probes for non-existant 
interfaces ide1-ide5 could be suppressed, no?

What would you think if we only output the "failed before probe" 
messages for interfaces that return -EBUSY from wait_hwif_ready? It 
would make the system boot a lot "prettier":)

P.

>
>Does the kernel know what the 'something' is? Should I be routing
>around in /proc looking for something specific?
>
>cheers,
>
>Phil
>
>  
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
  2005-01-12 13:35     ` Philip Armstrong
  2005-01-12 13:46       ` Prarit Bhargava
@ 2005-01-12 13:48       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2005-01-12 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: maximilian attems, linux-ide, 289770

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:35:24 +0000, Philip Armstrong <phil@kantaka.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > "something" steals resource needed for IDE driver so no DMA
> 
> Does the kernel know what the 'something' is? Should I be routing
> around in /proc looking for something specific?

/proc/ioports for both kernels should tells us more...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
  2005-01-12 13:46       ` Prarit Bhargava
@ 2005-01-12 13:50         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  2005-01-12 17:56         ` Philip Armstrong
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2005-01-12 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Prarit Bhargava; +Cc: Philip Armstrong, maximilian attems, linux-ide, 289770

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:46:32 -0500, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@sgi.com> wrote:
> Philip and Bartlomiej,
> 
> I've been tracking an almost identical problem on my IA64 platform with
> a bk pull that is about a month old.
> 
> I tracked it down to a duplicate vector request of 0x38 = 56 by the
> mmtimer -- take a look at /proc/interrupts, /proc/ioports, /proc/iomem
> and see if anything has requested the specific area that your CD is
> trying to get.
> 
> My output looked like:
> 
> SGIIOC4: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:01:01.0, revision 79
> ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc00001080c200140-0xc00001080c200163
> Probing IDE interface ide0...
> hda: MATSHITADVD-ROM SR-8588, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> ide0: Disabled unable to get IRQ 56.
> Probing IDE interface ide0...
> hda: MATSHITADVD-ROM SR-8588, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> hda: IRQ probe failed (0x4ffffffe)
> Probing IDE interface ide1...
> ide1: Wait for ready failed before probe !
> Probing IDE interface ide2...
> ide2: Wait for ready failed before probe !
> Probing IDE interface ide3...
> ide3: Wait for ready failed before probe !
> Probing IDE interface ide4...
> ide4: Wait for ready failed before probe !
> Probing IDE interface ide5...
> ide5: Wait for ready failed before probe !
> ide0: DISABLED, NO IRQ
> 
> Bartlomiej, just a thought:
> 
> I think that the output of the failures of the probes for non-existant
> interfaces ide1-ide5 could be suppressed, no?

yes

> What would you think if we only output the "failed before probe"
> messages for interfaces that return -EBUSY from wait_hwif_ready? It
> would make the system boot a lot "prettier":)

care to make a patch?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
  2005-01-12 13:46       ` Prarit Bhargava
  2005-01-12 13:50         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2005-01-12 17:56         ` Philip Armstrong
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Philip Armstrong @ 2005-01-12 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Prarit Bhargava
  Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, maximilian attems, linux-ide, 289770

On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 08:46:32AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Philip and Bartlomiej,
> 
> I've been tracking an almost identical problem on my IA64 platform with 
> a bk pull that is about a month old. 
> 
> I tracked it down to a duplicate vector request of 0x38 = 56 by the 
> mmtimer -- take a look at /proc/interrupts, /proc/ioports, /proc/iomem 
> and see if anything has requested the specific area that your CD is 
> trying to get.

Interrupts and iomem seem pretty much the same, but ioports looks like
the following:

bucephalus:~# diff -W 80 --side-by-side 2.6.8/ioports 2.6.10/ioports
0000-001f : dma1                        0000-001f : dma1
0020-0021 : pic1                        0020-0021 : pic1
0040-005f : timer                     | 0040-0043 : timer0
                                      > 0050-0053 : timer1
0060-006f : keyboard                    0060-006f : keyboard
0070-0077 : rtc                         0070-0077 : rtc
0080-008f : dma page reg                0080-008f : dma page reg
00a0-00a1 : pic2                        00a0-00a1 : pic2
00c0-00df : dma2                        00c0-00df : dma2
00f0-00ff : fpu                         00f0-00ff : fpu
01f0-01f7 : ide0                        01f0-01f7 : ide0
0200-0207 : ns558-pnp                   0200-0207 : ns558-pnp
03bc-03be : parport0                    03bc-03be : parport0
03c0-03df : vga+                        03c0-03df : vga+
03f6-03f6 : ide0                        03f6-03f6 : ide0
03f8-03ff : serial                      03f8-03ff : serial
04d0-04d1 : pnp 00:0a                   04d0-04d1 : pnp 00:0a
0530-0533 : Crystal audio controller    0530-0533 : Crystal audio
controller
0cf8-0cff : PCI conf1                   0cf8-0cff : PCI conf1
1000-100f : 0000:00:07.1              <
  1000-1007 : ide0                    <
15e0-15ef : pnp 00:0a                   15e0-15ef : pnp 00:0a
4000-40ff : PCI CardBus #02             4000-40ff : PCI CardBus #02
4400-44ff : PCI CardBus #02             4400-44ff : PCI CardBus #02
4800-48ff : PCI CardBus #06             4800-48ff : PCI CardBus #06
4c00-4cff : PCI CardBus #06             4c00-4cff : PCI CardBus #06
8400-841f : 0000:00:07.2                8400-841f : 0000:00:07.2
  8400-841f : uhci_hcd                    8400-841f : uhci_hcd
d000-dfff : PCI Bus #01                 d000-dfff : PCI Bus #01
                                      > ef00-ef3f : 0000:00:07.3
efa0-efbf : 0000:00:07.3                efa0-efbf : 0000:00:07.3
  ef00-efaf : pnp 00:0a               | fcf0-fcff : 0000:00:07.1
    ef00-ef3f : 0000:00:07.3          |   fcf8-fcff : pnp 00:1c
fcf8-fcff : pnp 00:1c                 <

cheers,

Phil

-- 
http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
  2005-01-12 12:52   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  2005-01-12 12:58     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  2005-01-12 13:35     ` Philip Armstrong
@ 2005-02-10 20:02     ` Philip Armstrong
  2005-02-11  6:55       ` Marcin Kuk
  2005-02-10 20:08     ` Philip Armstrong
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Philip Armstrong @ 2005-02-10 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz; +Cc: maximilian attems, linux-ide, 289770

On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2005 13:02, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 08:53:45PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > dma on a thinkpad  600E worked for 2.6.8, but didn't since 2.6.9
> > > also non working 2.6.10.
> > > 
> > > -hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63, UDMA(33)
> > > +hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63
> > > 
> > > could you please look at the following ide dma bug report for piix in
> > > debian -> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289770
> > > full dmesg of both 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 are posted there.
> 
> "something" steals resource needed for IDE driver so no DMA

Further investigation reveals that turning off CONFIG_PNPBIOS solves
the problem.

With PNPBIOS set, the kernel seems to think that the io range is in
use regardless of whether quickboot is set in the BIOS or not.

cheers,

Phil

-- 
http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
  2005-01-12 12:52   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
                       ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-02-10 20:02     ` Philip Armstrong
@ 2005-02-10 20:08     ` Philip Armstrong
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Philip Armstrong @ 2005-02-10 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz; +Cc: maximilian attems, linux-ide, 289770

On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>Further investigation reveals that turning off CONFIG_PNPBIOS solves
>the problem.

Addendum:

# diff 2.6.10/ioports nopnp/ioports
10a11
> 0100-013f : pcmcia_socket0
12,13d12
< 0200-0207 : ns558-pnp
< 03bc-03be : parport0
16,17d14
< 03f8-03ff : serial
< 04d0-04d1 : pnp 00:0a
20d16
< 15e0-15ef : pnp 00:0a
31c27
<   fcf8-fcff : pnp 00:1c
---
>   fcf0-fcf7 : ide0

(The nopnp kernel doesn't have the ns558 joystick driver compiled in)

cheers,

Phil

-- 
http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad
  2005-02-10 20:02     ` Philip Armstrong
@ 2005-02-11  6:55       ` Marcin Kuk
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marcin Kuk @ 2005-02-11  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philip Armstrong; +Cc: linux-ide, linux-kernel

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 08:02:01PM +0000, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 January 2005 13:02, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 08:53:45PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > dma on a thinkpad  600E worked for 2.6.8, but didn't since 2.6.9
> > > > also non working 2.6.10.
> > > > 
> > > > -hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63, UDMA(33)
> > > > +hda: 12594960 sectors (6448 MB) w/460KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63
> > > > 
> > > > could you please look at the following ide dma bug report for piix in
> > > > debian -> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289770
> > > > full dmesg of both 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 are posted there.
> > 
> > "something" steals resource needed for IDE driver so no DMA
> 
> Further investigation reveals that turning off CONFIG_PNPBIOS solves
> the problem.
> 
> With PNPBIOS set, the kernel seems to think that the io range is in
> use regardless of whether quickboot is set in the BIOS or not.

I have Toshiba Satellite 320CDT.
I compiled 2.6.10 vanilla kernel with CONFIG_PNPBIOS disabled.
All IDE drivers was compiled into the kernel.
I can't still enable DMA for my harrddisk.
This is my earlier crying:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110789166000004&r=1&w=2

What can I do?

Best regards

-- 
Marcin Kuk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-11  6:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-11 19:53 (fwd) Re: Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad maximilian attems
2005-01-12 12:02 ` Philip Armstrong
2005-01-12 12:52   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-01-12 12:58     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-01-12 13:35     ` Philip Armstrong
2005-01-12 13:46       ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-01-12 13:50         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-01-12 17:56         ` Philip Armstrong
2005-01-12 13:48       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-02-10 20:02     ` Philip Armstrong
2005-02-11  6:55       ` Marcin Kuk
2005-02-10 20:08     ` Philip Armstrong

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).